Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

E-Mentorluk Sürecinin Mente Başarısına Etkisi

Year 2013, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 170 - 186, 10.06.2013

Abstract

Bu araştırma ile il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının mesleki gelişimlerini sürdürmelerinde ementorluk
modelinin sürece olan katkılarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Öncelikle tüm etkinliklerin
gerçekleştirildiği uygulama sitesi (www.e-mentorum.com) hazırlanarak yayınlanmıştır. Literatür taraması ve
uygulama başlangıcında uygulama sitesi kullanıcılarından gelen istekler doğrultusunda belirlenen sekiz öğrenme
içeriği ile ilgili öğrenme materyalleri hazırlanarak uygulama sitesine yüklenmiştir. Uygulama sitesinde yönetici, ementor
ve mente olarak üç farklı kullanıcı grubu tanımlanmıştır. 2011-2012 yılında, Elazığ, Malatya ve Bingöl
illerinde görevli il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarından 59’unun katılımıyla gerçekleştirilen araştırmada
akademisyen ve deneyimli il eğitim denetmenleri e-mentor, çalışma grubunda yer alan diğer il eğitim denetmen ve
yardımcıları mente, araştırmacı ise yönetici olarak atanmıştır. Tek grup öntest sontest deneysel desende
gerçekleştirilen araştırmada uygulama sitesi üzerinden yapılacak etkinliklerin neler olduğu ve nasıl yapılacağı
hakkında oryantasyon eğitimleri verilmiştir. E-mentorluk uygulamasının, il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının
başarılarına etkisini belirlemek için başarı testi kullanılmıştır. Sonraki aşamada başarı testi öntesti yapılarak
uygulamaya başlanmıştır. 10 hafta süren araştırma sonunda başarı testi sontestleri uygulanmıştır.
Araştırma sonucunda elde verilerin analizi aşamasında ilişkili örneklemler t testi, Kruskal Wallis H testi ve
Mann Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi ile e-mentorluk uygulamasının, il eğitim denetmen ve
yardımcılarının başarılarına olumlu katkı sağladığı görülmüştür.

References

  • Anderson, E. M. & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42.
  • Asgari, M. & O’Neill, K. (2004). What do they mean by ‘success’? Contributors to perceived success in a telementoring program for adolescents, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April.
  • Bean, R. M. & Swan, A. L. (2002, December). Evaluating the success of a professional development initiative: Satisfaction is not enough Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
  • Bierema, L. L. & Merriam, S. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 211-227.
  • Brescia W.F. (2002). Using a Telementoring Taxonomy in a World Wide Web Instructional Environment: A Case Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Burgstahler, S. & Cronheim, D. (2001). Supporting peer–peer and mentor–protégé relationships on the Internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 59–74.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001).Deneysel Desenler. Pegema Yayıncılık. Ankara.
  • Folsom, A. C. (1995). The contributions of locus of control to the effect of mentoring tactics in computer-based instruction on college students’ achievement. Doctoral Dissertation. DAI, 56-12A: 4734.
  • Griffiths, M., Miller, H. (2005). E-mentoring: Does it have a place in medicine? Postgraduate Mededical Journal; 81: 389–390.
  • Harris, J., O’Bryan, E. & Rotenberg, L. (1996). It’s a simple idea, but it’s not easy to do: Practical lessons in telementoring. Learning and Leading With Technology 24(2): 53–57.
  • Hasselbring, T. S. & Williams Glaser, C. H. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. The Future of Children – Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 102–122.
  • Hezlett S. A., Gibson S. (2005). Mentoring and human resource development: where we are and where we need to go. Advances in Developing Human Resources 7(2):446–469. doi:10.1177/1523422305279667.
  • Hubschman, B. G. (1996). The effect of mentoring electronic mail on student achievement and attitudes in a graduate course in educational research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57-08A:3417.
  • Klasen, N. & Clutterbuck, D. (2005). Implementing Mentoring Schemes A Proctical Guide to Successful Programs, Butterworth-Heinemann, USA.
  • Knouse, S. B. (2001). Virtual Mentors: Mentoring on the Internet. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38(4), 162–169.
  • Kocabaş, İ. ve Yirci, R. (2011). Öğretmen ve Yönetici Yetiştirmede Mentorluk Mentorluğun
  • Eğitimde Kullanılması, Ankara: Anı.
  • Kocabaş, İ. ve Yirci, R. (2012). Dünyada Mentorluk Uygulamaları. Ramazan Yirci ve İbrahim Kocabaş (Ed.), Türkiye’de Bir Mentorluk Uygulaması: Aday Öğretmenlerin Yetiştirilmesi içinde (s.227-244). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Landsberg, M. (1996). The Tao of Coaching, HarperCollins, Toronto, ON.
  • Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS, Routledge, USA.
  • McDonald, K. E., Balcazar, F. E. & Keys, C. B. (2005). Youth with disabilities. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 493–507). Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi: Sage.
  • O’Neill, D. K., Wagner, R. & Gomez, L. M. (1996). Online mentors: experimenting in science class, Educational Leadership, 54(3), 39–42.
  • Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows 4th edition. McGraw-Hill Education, England.
  • Palloff, R. M., Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom. The Realities of Online Teaching Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California, USA. Polater, S. (2003). Mentor-Akıl Hocası, Liderlik. İnternet adresi: http://www.polater.com.tr/devam.php?sub_ page1&page=bilgi_agaci&new_page=07, 12/011/2010.
  • Seabrooks, J. J., Kenney, S. & LaMontagne, M. (2000). Collaboration and virtual mentoring: Building relationships between pre-service and in-service special education teachers. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 219-236.
  • Single, P. B., Muller, C. B. (1999). Electronic mentoring: Issues to advance research and practice. content_storage_01/ 0000019b/80/16/23/d4.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.11.2010). adresi:
  • http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/
  • Yirci, R. (2009). Mentorluğun Eğitimde Kullanılması ve Okul Yöneticisi Yetiştirmede Yeni Bir Model Önerisi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.

The Effects of E-Mentorship Process on Mentee Achievement

Year 2013, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 170 - 186, 10.06.2013

Abstract

With this study, we aim to determine the contributions of e-mentorship model on the sustainability
of provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors. First of all, we have designed and published a web-site
(www.e-mentorum.com) to carry out all activities. Based on both literature review and the demands of prospective
system users at the beginning phase of the implementation, we have determined eight learning content packages
and designed appropriate instructional materials and then uploaded them to the web site. We defined three
distinct user-groups called as admin, e-mentor, and mentee. This study was carried out in 2011-2012 years by the
participation of 59 provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors who were on duty in provinces of
Elazig, Malatya, and Bingol. In this study, academicians and experienced provincial education supervisors i were
assigned as e-mentor, other provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors were assigned as mente
while researcher was admin. Before the implementation of this study, which one group pretest-posttest design
model was adopted, for this study and we run an orientation program on what kinds of activities would take place
during the implementation and how they would be achieved.
Achievement test was used to determine the effect of e-mentorship implementation on the success of
provincial education supervisors and assistant supervisors as pretest at the beginning of the implementation and as
posttest at the end of the implementation (after 10 weeks). For the analyses of the data, paired-sample t-test,
Kruskal Wallis H-test, and Mann Whitney U test were used. Based on the results of the analyses, we found that ementorship implementation had positive impact on the success of provincial education supervisors and assistant
supervisors.

References

  • Anderson, E. M. & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42.
  • Asgari, M. & O’Neill, K. (2004). What do they mean by ‘success’? Contributors to perceived success in a telementoring program for adolescents, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April.
  • Bean, R. M. & Swan, A. L. (2002, December). Evaluating the success of a professional development initiative: Satisfaction is not enough Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
  • Bierema, L. L. & Merriam, S. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 211-227.
  • Brescia W.F. (2002). Using a Telementoring Taxonomy in a World Wide Web Instructional Environment: A Case Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  • Burgstahler, S. & Cronheim, D. (2001). Supporting peer–peer and mentor–protégé relationships on the Internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 59–74.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001).Deneysel Desenler. Pegema Yayıncılık. Ankara.
  • Folsom, A. C. (1995). The contributions of locus of control to the effect of mentoring tactics in computer-based instruction on college students’ achievement. Doctoral Dissertation. DAI, 56-12A: 4734.
  • Griffiths, M., Miller, H. (2005). E-mentoring: Does it have a place in medicine? Postgraduate Mededical Journal; 81: 389–390.
  • Harris, J., O’Bryan, E. & Rotenberg, L. (1996). It’s a simple idea, but it’s not easy to do: Practical lessons in telementoring. Learning and Leading With Technology 24(2): 53–57.
  • Hasselbring, T. S. & Williams Glaser, C. H. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. The Future of Children – Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 102–122.
  • Hezlett S. A., Gibson S. (2005). Mentoring and human resource development: where we are and where we need to go. Advances in Developing Human Resources 7(2):446–469. doi:10.1177/1523422305279667.
  • Hubschman, B. G. (1996). The effect of mentoring electronic mail on student achievement and attitudes in a graduate course in educational research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57-08A:3417.
  • Klasen, N. & Clutterbuck, D. (2005). Implementing Mentoring Schemes A Proctical Guide to Successful Programs, Butterworth-Heinemann, USA.
  • Knouse, S. B. (2001). Virtual Mentors: Mentoring on the Internet. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38(4), 162–169.
  • Kocabaş, İ. ve Yirci, R. (2011). Öğretmen ve Yönetici Yetiştirmede Mentorluk Mentorluğun
  • Eğitimde Kullanılması, Ankara: Anı.
  • Kocabaş, İ. ve Yirci, R. (2012). Dünyada Mentorluk Uygulamaları. Ramazan Yirci ve İbrahim Kocabaş (Ed.), Türkiye’de Bir Mentorluk Uygulaması: Aday Öğretmenlerin Yetiştirilmesi içinde (s.227-244). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Landsberg, M. (1996). The Tao of Coaching, HarperCollins, Toronto, ON.
  • Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS, Routledge, USA.
  • McDonald, K. E., Balcazar, F. E. & Keys, C. B. (2005). Youth with disabilities. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 493–507). Thousand Oaks, London & New Delhi: Sage.
  • O’Neill, D. K., Wagner, R. & Gomez, L. M. (1996). Online mentors: experimenting in science class, Educational Leadership, 54(3), 39–42.
  • Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows 4th edition. McGraw-Hill Education, England.
  • Palloff, R. M., Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom. The Realities of Online Teaching Jossey-Bass Inc., 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California, USA. Polater, S. (2003). Mentor-Akıl Hocası, Liderlik. İnternet adresi: http://www.polater.com.tr/devam.php?sub_ page1&page=bilgi_agaci&new_page=07, 12/011/2010.
  • Seabrooks, J. J., Kenney, S. & LaMontagne, M. (2000). Collaboration and virtual mentoring: Building relationships between pre-service and in-service special education teachers. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 219-236.
  • Single, P. B., Muller, C. B. (1999). Electronic mentoring: Issues to advance research and practice. content_storage_01/ 0000019b/80/16/23/d4.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.11.2010). adresi:
  • http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/
  • Yirci, R. (2009). Mentorluğun Eğitimde Kullanılması ve Okul Yöneticisi Yetiştirmede Yeni Bir Model Önerisi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dr. Tuncay Yavuz Özdemir

Doç. Dr. Mukadder Boydak Özan This is me

Publication Date June 10, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özdemir, D. T. Y., & Boydak Özan, D. D. M. (2013). E-Mentorluk Sürecinin Mente Başarısına Etkisi. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 2(1), 170-186.

All the articles published in the journal are open access and distributed under the conditions of CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License 

88x31.png


Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education