Abstract
Amaç: Çalışmada, elektif veya acil nedenlerden dolayı sezaryen yapılan hastalarda postoperatif ağrının karakteristik özelliklerini analiz etmek amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma, sezaryen yapılan 78 hastayı içeren gözlemsel ve tanımlayıcı bir kesitsel analizdir. Araştırma esnasında hastaların ilk 6 saatteki görsel ağrı skalası (VAS) skorları değerlendirilmiş ve ağrılarının karakteristik tanımlamaları sorgulanmıştır.
Bulgular: Postoperatif ilk 6 saatteki ortalama VAS skorları 5.56 ± 1.31'dir. Hastaların ağrı hissettiği vücut lokalizasyonu insizyon bölgesinde %7.7, umbilikus altında %14.1, tüm karın bölgesinde %23.1, insizyonun sağ tarafında %50, insizyonun sol tarafında %1.3, insizyonun her iki yanında %3,8 olarak saptanmıştır. Hastaların anestezi tipleri ve VAS skorları karşılaştırıldığında, ortalamalar arasındaki fark, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmamıştır (p> 0.05). Ağrının yeri ile sezaryen sayısı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmemiştir (p> 0.05). Postoperatif mobilizasyon saatleri ile hastaların memnuniyet skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmıştır (p <0.05).
Sonuç: Sezaryen sonrası ağrının azaltılması; annenin iyileşme süreci ve anne ile bebek arasındaki erken bağın gelişimi için oldukça önemlidir. Sezaryen sonrası ağrının en çok hissedilen yeri tespit edilir, değerlendirilir ve özellikleri belirlenirse; ağrıyı azaltmak veya ortadan kaldırmak için uygun müdahaleler planlanabilir.
Supporting Institution
Yok
References
- 1. Yanıkkerem UE, Kitapçıoğlu G, Karadeniz G. Women's view of birth methods, experience and satisfaction. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2010;5(13):107-123.
- 2. Yanıkkerem UE, Göker A, Nicole Piro N. Women’s opinions about mode of delivery and satisfaction with hospital care after cesarean delivery. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi. 2013;29(2):75-81.
- 3. Çapık A, Sakar T, Yıldırım N, Karabacak K, Korkut M. Determining the satisfaction levels of the mothers according to their mode of birth. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2016;19(2):92-99.
- 4. Pınar G, Doğan N, Algıer L,Kaya N, Çakmak F. Factors that affecting mothers’ postnatal comfort.Dicle Tıp Dergisi .2015; 36(3), 184-190.
- 5. Brown AK, Christo PJ, Wu CL. Strategies for Postoperative Pain Management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004;18(4):703-17.
- 6. Shea RA, Brooks JA, Dayhoff NE, Keck J. Pain Intensity and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Among the Elderly After Abdominal Surgery. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 2002;31(6):440-9.
- 7. Wang H-L, Keck JF. Foot and Hand Massage as an Intervention for Postoperative Pain. Pain Management Nursing. 2004;5(2):59-65.
- 8. Huang SY, Sheu SJ, Tai CJ, Chiang CP, Chien LY. Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan. Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17: 842–851.
- 9. Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M. Factors related to a negative birth experience - A mixed methods study. Midwifery. 2017; 51:33-39.
- 10. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. The Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819-29.
- 11. Eyi EGY, Mollamahmutoglu L. An analysis of the high cesarean delivery rates in Turkey by Robson classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1:1-11.
- 12. Güngör I, Kızılkaya Beji N. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and cesarean birth. Midwifery 2012;28(3):348-5.
- 13. Saunders WB. Cesarean Delivery, High RiskPregnancy. 2 nd ed. Harcourt Publishers Limited. 1999;1:10-12.
- 14. Klopfenstein CE, Herrmann F, Mamie C, Van Gessel E, Forster A. Pain intensity and pain relief after surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2000;44(1):58-62.
- 15. D'Arcy YM. Pain management: Evidence-based tools and techniques for nursing professionals: marblehead, MA: Hcpro Incorporated; 2007;2:164.
- 16. Duncan GH, Bushnell MC, Lavigne GJ. Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain. Pain.1989;37(3):295-303.
- 17. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117-26.
- 18. D'Arcy YM. Pain assessment in medical-legal aspects of pain and suffering. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company. 2003.
- 19. Olofsson CI, Legeby MH, Nygards EB, Ostman KM. Diclofenac in The Treatment of Pain After Cesarean Delivery. An Opioid-Saving Strategy. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2000;88(2):143-6.
- 20. Valente SM. Hypnosis for Pain Management. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 2006;44(2):22-30.
- 21. Coll MA.,Jemel R M.,Mead D. Postoperative pain assesment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:2.
- 22. Ngan Kee W, Khaw K, Wong E. Randomised double-blind comparison of morphine vs. a morphine–alfentanil combination for patient controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1999; 54(7): 629-33.
- 23. Vijayan R, Delilkan A. First year’s experience with an acute pain service–University Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Med J Malaysia. 1994;49(4):385-400.
- 24. Taenzer P, Melzack R, Jeans ME. Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements. Pain. 1986;24(3):331-42.
- 25. Boyle P, Parbrook GD. The interrelation of personality and postoperative factors. Br J Anaesth. 1977; 49 (3): 259-264.
- 26. Chung F, Ritchie E, Su J. Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1997;85(4):808-16.
- 27. Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber, DeMore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Medicine. 2009;10(4):708-15.
- 28. Kessous R, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, et al. Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean deliverys: the effects on postoperative pain perception. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2012;286(1):75-79.
- 29. Gonano C, Leitgeb U, Sitzwohl C, Ihra G, Weinstabl C, Kettner SC. Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: anesthesia drug and supply costs. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006;102(2):524-9.
- 30. SousaI L., Pitangui ACR, Gomes FA, Nakano AMS, Ferreira CHJ. Measurement and characteristics of post-cesarean delivery pain and the relationship to limitation of physical activities. Acta paul. enferm. 2009; 22: 6.
- 31. Astepe B.S. The Relationship Between Preoperative Anxiety Level and Postoperative Pain in Patients With Cesarean Delivery. Kocaeli Med J. 2018; 7; 3:64-69.
- 32. Niven C. How helpful is the presence of the husband at childbirth? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 1985;3(2):45-53.
- 33. Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Postcesarean delivery pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology.2003;98(6):142-226.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of postoperative pain in patients undergoing cesarean delivery for elective or urgent reasons.
Material and Methods: This study is an observational descriptive cross-sectional analysis involving 78 patients who underwent cesarean delivery. Visual Pain Scale (VAS) scores of 78 patients were evaluated in the first 6 hours and the patients were asked about the characteristic descriptions of the pain.
Results: Mean VAS scores in the first 6 hours postoperatively were 5.56 ± 1.31. Body localizations where the patients feel pain were 7.7% in the incision site, 14.1% under the umbilicus, 23.1% in the whole abdominal region, 50% on the right side of the incision, 1.3% on the left side of the incision and 3.8% on both sides of the incision. When the anesthesia types and VAS scores of the patients were compared, the differences between the averages were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the location of pain and the number of cesarean sections (p >0.05). There was a statistically significant relationship between the postoperative mobilization hours and the patients' satisfaction scores (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Treatment of the post-cesarean pain is very important for the recovery process of the mother and the development of the early bond between the mother and the infant. If the post-cesarean delivery pain is identified, evaluated and its characteristics are determined, appropriate interventions can be made to reduce or eliminate the pain.
References
- 1. Yanıkkerem UE, Kitapçıoğlu G, Karadeniz G. Women's view of birth methods, experience and satisfaction. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi. 2010;5(13):107-123.
- 2. Yanıkkerem UE, Göker A, Nicole Piro N. Women’s opinions about mode of delivery and satisfaction with hospital care after cesarean delivery. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi. 2013;29(2):75-81.
- 3. Çapık A, Sakar T, Yıldırım N, Karabacak K, Korkut M. Determining the satisfaction levels of the mothers according to their mode of birth. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2016;19(2):92-99.
- 4. Pınar G, Doğan N, Algıer L,Kaya N, Çakmak F. Factors that affecting mothers’ postnatal comfort.Dicle Tıp Dergisi .2015; 36(3), 184-190.
- 5. Brown AK, Christo PJ, Wu CL. Strategies for Postoperative Pain Management. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2004;18(4):703-17.
- 6. Shea RA, Brooks JA, Dayhoff NE, Keck J. Pain Intensity and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Among the Elderly After Abdominal Surgery. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 2002;31(6):440-9.
- 7. Wang H-L, Keck JF. Foot and Hand Massage as an Intervention for Postoperative Pain. Pain Management Nursing. 2004;5(2):59-65.
- 8. Huang SY, Sheu SJ, Tai CJ, Chiang CP, Chien LY. Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan. Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17: 842–851.
- 9. Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M. Factors related to a negative birth experience - A mixed methods study. Midwifery. 2017; 51:33-39.
- 10. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, et al. Cesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. The Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819-29.
- 11. Eyi EGY, Mollamahmutoglu L. An analysis of the high cesarean delivery rates in Turkey by Robson classification. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1:1-11.
- 12. Güngör I, Kızılkaya Beji N. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and cesarean birth. Midwifery 2012;28(3):348-5.
- 13. Saunders WB. Cesarean Delivery, High RiskPregnancy. 2 nd ed. Harcourt Publishers Limited. 1999;1:10-12.
- 14. Klopfenstein CE, Herrmann F, Mamie C, Van Gessel E, Forster A. Pain intensity and pain relief after surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2000;44(1):58-62.
- 15. D'Arcy YM. Pain management: Evidence-based tools and techniques for nursing professionals: marblehead, MA: Hcpro Incorporated; 2007;2:164.
- 16. Duncan GH, Bushnell MC, Lavigne GJ. Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain. Pain.1989;37(3):295-303.
- 17. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117-26.
- 18. D'Arcy YM. Pain assessment in medical-legal aspects of pain and suffering. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company. 2003.
- 19. Olofsson CI, Legeby MH, Nygards EB, Ostman KM. Diclofenac in The Treatment of Pain After Cesarean Delivery. An Opioid-Saving Strategy. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2000;88(2):143-6.
- 20. Valente SM. Hypnosis for Pain Management. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 2006;44(2):22-30.
- 21. Coll MA.,Jemel R M.,Mead D. Postoperative pain assesment tools in day surgery: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:2.
- 22. Ngan Kee W, Khaw K, Wong E. Randomised double-blind comparison of morphine vs. a morphine–alfentanil combination for patient controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1999; 54(7): 629-33.
- 23. Vijayan R, Delilkan A. First year’s experience with an acute pain service–University Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Med J Malaysia. 1994;49(4):385-400.
- 24. Taenzer P, Melzack R, Jeans ME. Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements. Pain. 1986;24(3):331-42.
- 25. Boyle P, Parbrook GD. The interrelation of personality and postoperative factors. Br J Anaesth. 1977; 49 (3): 259-264.
- 26. Chung F, Ritchie E, Su J. Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1997;85(4):808-16.
- 27. Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber, DeMore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Medicine. 2009;10(4):708-15.
- 28. Kessous R, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, et al. Spinal versus general anesthesia in cesarean deliverys: the effects on postoperative pain perception. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2012;286(1):75-79.
- 29. Gonano C, Leitgeb U, Sitzwohl C, Ihra G, Weinstabl C, Kettner SC. Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: anesthesia drug and supply costs. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2006;102(2):524-9.
- 30. SousaI L., Pitangui ACR, Gomes FA, Nakano AMS, Ferreira CHJ. Measurement and characteristics of post-cesarean delivery pain and the relationship to limitation of physical activities. Acta paul. enferm. 2009; 22: 6.
- 31. Astepe B.S. The Relationship Between Preoperative Anxiety Level and Postoperative Pain in Patients With Cesarean Delivery. Kocaeli Med J. 2018; 7; 3:64-69.
- 32. Niven C. How helpful is the presence of the husband at childbirth? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 1985;3(2):45-53.
- 33. Granot M, Lowenstein L, Yarnitsky D, Tamir A, Zimmer EZ. Postcesarean delivery pain prediction by preoperative experimental pain assessment. Anesthesiology.2003;98(6):142-226.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | January 21, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 4 Issue: 1 |
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].
The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;
Ulakbim TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR, EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC), DOAJ, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index
Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review".
Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user. https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535
Journal charge policy https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912
Editor List for 2022
Assoc. Prof. Alpaslan TANOĞLU (MD)
Prof. Aydın ÇİFCİ (MD)
Prof. İbrahim Celalaettin HAZNEDAROĞLU (MD)
Prof. Murat KEKİLLİ (MD)
Prof. Yavuz BEYAZIT (MD)
Prof. Ekrem ÜNAL (MD)
Prof. Ahmet EKEN (MD)
Assoc. Prof. Ercan YUVANÇ (MD)
Assoc. Prof. Bekir UÇAN (MD)
Assoc. Prof. Mehmet Sinan DAL (MD)
Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.
Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.
Articles published in the Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.