EN
TR
-
Abstract
Aims. To assess of factors associated with time until to treatment and analyze of demographic and clinical characteristics of corneal foreign body patients. Method. Fifty-nine eyes of 59 corneal foreign body patients were included in this study. Routine ophthalmological examination was performed of patients. Superficial foreign body was removed with the aid of the needle tip with using the slit lamp after instillation of local anesthetic. The factors associated with time until to treatment were statistically evaluated. Results. Of 59 patients, 10 (16.9%) were female and 49 (83.1%) were male. The mean time until to treatment of the patients, age, size of the foreign body were as follows; 105.79±174.80 hour, 32.96±13.52 year, 1.288±1.087mm. The agent was mostly iron (49.2%). Foreign body, there was 33 (55.9%) right eye and 26 (44.1%) left eye of cases. Corneal foreign body localization were mostly central corneal (40.7%) inferior nasal (28.8%) and inferior temporal (23.7%). The job was mostly worker (47.5%) and farmer (25.4%). The assessed by Mann-Whitney U test and there was no association between time until to treatment and age, affected eye, size of the foreign body and corneal foreign body localization. Time until to treatment showed statistically significant association with gender, foreign body agent and job (p<0.05). Conclusion. It is observed that young men mostly affected at corneal foreign bodies, time until to treatment by associated with gender, foreign body agent and job, mostly central corneal, inferior nasal and inferior temporal localization of corneal foreign body.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Macedo Filho ET, Lago A, Duarte K, Liang SJ, Lima AL, Freitas Dd. Superficial corneal foreign body: laboratory and epidemiologic aspects. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2005; 68: 821-3.
- Alexander MM, MacLeod JD, Hall NF, Elkington AR. More than meets the eye: a study of the time lost from work by patients who incurred injuries from corneal foreign bodies. Br J Ophthalmol 1991; 75: 740-2.
- Gümüş K, Karaküçük S, Mirza E. Corneal injury from a metallic foreign body: an occupational hazard. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 259-60.
- Nicaeus T, Erb C, Rohrbach M, Thiel HJ. An analysis of 148 outpatient treated occupational accidents. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1996; 209: A7-11.
- Ergin A, Çınar P, Baş O, Altın A, Ergin P. Acil servisten göz acili olarak göz kliniğine sevk edilen hastaların özellikleri. Bidder Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 2011; 3: 6Akdur O, Özkan S, Erkılıç K, Durukan P, Duman A, İkizceli İ. Acil servise göz travması nedeniyle başvuran olguların değerlendirilmesi. Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi 2009; 8: 47-50.
- Yiğit O, Yürüktümen A, Arslan S. Foreign body traumas of the eye managed in an emergency department of a single-institution. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2012; 18: 75-9.
- Goyal R, Shankar J, Fone DL, Hughes DS. Randomised controlled trial of ketorolac in the management of corneal abrasions. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001; 79: 177-9.
- Kaiser PK, Pineda R 2nd. A study of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drops and no pressure patching in the treatment of corneal abrasions. Corneal Abrasion Patching Study Group. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 1353-9.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
27 Haziran 2013
Gönderilme Tarihi
28 Ekim 2012
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 1970 Cilt: 35 Sayı: 2