Sistematik Derleme ve Meta-Analizi

Ahmet Aslan

doi:10.30565/medalanya.439541

Editoryal

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 62 - 63, 02.07.2018

Ahmet Aslan

https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.439541

Cited By: 25

Öz

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Anahtar Kelimeler

Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analyses

Kaynakça

1.Gülpınar Ö, Güçlü AG. Derleme makalesi nasıl yazılır? Turkish Journal of Urology, 2013;39(Özel Sayı 1): 44-8.
2. Balcı S, Baydemir C. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Meta Analizi . Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2015;1(1):9-11.
3. Ata B, Urman B. Sistematik Derlemelerin Kritik Analizi. TJOD Derg, 2008;5(4):233-40.
4. Bown MJ, Sutton AJ. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;40(5):669-77.
5. Aslan A. [Evidence Based Medicine and Clinical Practise Guidlines]. Acta Med. Alanya 2018;1(1):1-2. Turkish. DOI: 10.30565/medalanya.405333
6. Akgöz S, Ercan İ, Kan İ. Meta-analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30(2):107-112.
7. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C. Traditional Reviews, Meta analysis and pooled analysis in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28: 1- 9.
8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epid 2009;62(10):1006-12.
9. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283(15):2008-12.
10. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009 [updated September 2009].
11. Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, Juni P, Klassen T, Le Lorier J, et al. Completeness ofreporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet 1996;347(8998):363-6.
12. Alberani V, Pietrangeli PDC, Mazza AMR (1990). The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 78(4): 358-363.
13. Paez A. Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;10(3):233-240.
14. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M et al. Grey literature in systematic reviews: across-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 19;17(1):64.
15. Özcan NK, Bilgin H. Türkiye’de Sağlık Çalışanlarına Yönelik Şiddet: Sistematik Derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2011;31(6):1442-56.
16. Ay F. Treatment of postoperative pain and non-pharmacologic practices in nursing systematic review: Results of Turkish doctoral dissertation in 2000–2015. Agri 2018;30(2):71-83.
17. Aykan ŞB, Çiftci İH. Meta-Analiz: Türkiye’de Pseudomonas aeruginosa İzolatlarının Son 11 Yıldaki Antibiyotik Direnç Değişimi. Mikrobiyol Bul 2015; 49(3): 352-365.
18. Karaçam Z. Sistematik Derleme Metodolojisi: Sistematik Derleme Hazırlamak İçin Bir Rehber. DEUHYO ED 2013,6 (1), 26-33.

Sistematik Derleme ve Meta-Analizi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 62 - 63, 02.07.2018

Ahmet Aslan

https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.439541

Cited By: 25

Öz

Sistematik Derleme ve Meta-Analizi

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sistematik Derleme, Meta-Analizi

Kaynakça

1.Gülpınar Ö, Güçlü AG. Derleme makalesi nasıl yazılır? Turkish Journal of Urology, 2013;39(Özel Sayı 1): 44-8.
2. Balcı S, Baydemir C. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Meta Analizi . Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2015;1(1):9-11.
3. Ata B, Urman B. Sistematik Derlemelerin Kritik Analizi. TJOD Derg, 2008;5(4):233-40.
4. Bown MJ, Sutton AJ. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;40(5):669-77.
5. Aslan A. [Evidence Based Medicine and Clinical Practise Guidlines]. Acta Med. Alanya 2018;1(1):1-2. Turkish. DOI: 10.30565/medalanya.405333
6. Akgöz S, Ercan İ, Kan İ. Meta-analizi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2004;30(2):107-112.
7. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C. Traditional Reviews, Meta analysis and pooled analysis in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28: 1- 9.
8. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epid 2009;62(10):1006-12.
9. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283(15):2008-12.
10. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009 [updated September 2009].
11. Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, Juni P, Klassen T, Le Lorier J, et al. Completeness ofreporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet 1996;347(8998):363-6.
12. Alberani V, Pietrangeli PDC, Mazza AMR (1990). The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 78(4): 358-363.
13. Paez A. Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;10(3):233-240.
14. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M et al. Grey literature in systematic reviews: across-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 19;17(1):64.
15. Özcan NK, Bilgin H. Türkiye’de Sağlık Çalışanlarına Yönelik Şiddet: Sistematik Derleme. Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2011;31(6):1442-56.
16. Ay F. Treatment of postoperative pain and non-pharmacologic practices in nursing systematic review: Results of Turkish doctoral dissertation in 2000–2015. Agri 2018;30(2):71-83.
17. Aykan ŞB, Çiftci İH. Meta-Analiz: Türkiye’de Pseudomonas aeruginosa İzolatlarının Son 11 Yıldaki Antibiyotik Direnç Değişimi. Mikrobiyol Bul 2015; 49(3): 352-365.
18. Karaçam Z. Sistematik Derleme Metodolojisi: Sistematik Derleme Hazırlamak İçin Bir Rehber. DEUHYO ED 2013,6 (1), 26-33.

Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	Türkçe
Konular	Klinik Tıp Bilimleri
Bölüm	Editöryal
Yazarlar	Ahmet Aslan
Yayımlanma Tarihi	2 Temmuz 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi	1 Temmuz 2018
Kabul Tarihi	2 Temmuz 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2018 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2