Research Article

Living with Family and Clinical, Demographic, and Laboratory Characteristics in Patients with Heart Failure

Volume: 46 Number: 1 March 29, 2024
TR EN

Living with Family and Clinical, Demographic, and Laboratory Characteristics in Patients with Heart Failure

Abstract

Objective: Heart failure (HF) is a progressive clinical syndrome associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is known that during the course of this syndrome, social factors can impact clinical outcomes alongside medical interventions. Studies have demonstrated that social support provides favorable developments in mortality rates, event-free survival, and readmission rates in HF patients. In our study, we aimed to elucidate the effects of the concept of family, the most significant social support, on clinical characteristics, exercise capacity, echocardiographic, and laboratory features in HF cases. Methods: A multicenter cohort study was conducted, including 303 patients previously diagnosed with HF, following current guidelines and presenting for outpatient follow-up. Patients with a new diagnosis of HF, those with acute decompensated HF, and those with a history of malignancy were excluded from the study. Demographic data (age, gender), comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, etc.), HF treatments, laboratory tests, and detailed transthoracic echocardiography results were recorded. Results: Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they lived with a spouse, parent, child, or without any of them, defining the presence or absence of family support. In the study, 303 patients with an average age of 62.1±13.0, of which 94 (31%) were female, were included. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 28.7±8.1. When the groups were compared in terms of comorbidities, there was no statistically significant difference in the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, or atrial fibrillation (all p>0.005). Coronary artery disease was more frequently observed in the group with family support, while chronic kidney disease was more common in the group without family support (p=0.008 and p=0.012, respectively). Smoking prevalence was significantly higher in the group without family support, while alcohol use showed no significant difference (p=0.046 and p=0.602, respectively). Analyzing the results, it was observed that patients with family support were more regularly monitored for HF reasons (71% vs. 59%, p=0.054). Conclusion: It has been observed that the social support provided by family members in individuals with HF can have positive effects on the clinical course of the disease and the patient's lifestyle.

Keywords

References

  1. Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, et al. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Mar;23(3):352-380.
  2. Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, Seferovic P, Rosano GMC, Coats AJS. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2023 Jan 18;118(17):3272-3287.
  3. Celik A, Ural D, Sahin A, et al. Trends in heart failure between 2016 and 2022 in Türkiye (TRends-HF): a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 85 million individuals across entire population of all ages. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Sep 5;33:100723. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100723.
  4. Ruppar TM, Cooper PS, Mehr DR, Delgado JM, Dunbar-Jacob JM. Medication Adherence Interventions Improve Heart Failure Mortality and Readmission Rates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 17;5(6):e002606.
  5. Luttik ML, Jaarsma T, Moser D, Sanderman R, van Veldhuisen DJ. The importance and impact of social support on outcomes in patients with heart failure: an overview of the literature. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):162-9.
  6. Senturk B, Kaya H, Celik A, Bekar L, Gungor H, Zoghi M, Ural D, Cavusoglu Y, Temizhan A, Yilmaz MB. Marital status and outcomes in chronic heart failure: Does it make a difference of being married, widow or widower? North Clin Istanb. 2021 Jan 29;8(1):63-70.
  7. Chin MH, Goldman L. Correlates of early hospital readmission or death in patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1640– 4.
  8. Chung ML, Lennie TA, Riegel B, Wu JR, Dekker RL, Moser DK. Marital status as an independent predictor of event-free survival of patients with heart failure. Am J Crit Care 2009;18:562–70.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Family Medicine

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 29, 2024

Submission Date

January 5, 2024

Acceptance Date

March 4, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 46 Number: 1

AMA
1.Şahin ET, Yılmaz Öztekin GM, Genç A, Şahin A. Living with Family and Clinical, Demographic, and Laboratory Characteristics in Patients with Heart Failure. CMJ. 2024;46(1):35-40. doi:10.7197/cmj.1414749

Cited By