Research Article

Our Clinic's Experience with Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty

Volume: 46 Number: 1 March 29, 2024
EN TR

Our Clinic's Experience with Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty

Abstract

Objective: We aim to present the outcomes of the Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) procedure performed in our clinic. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the outcomes of LHP performed on 112 patients in our clinic over a 24-month period. Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits at three weeks post-surgery, followed by subsequent follow-ups at three and six-month intervals. Results: Of the 112 patients, 73 (65.17%) were male, and 39 (34.82%) were female. The mean age was 52.6 years (range: 20-65). The mean operation duration was 18.3 minutes (range: 12-25). Seventy patients were classified as grade 2, while 42 patients were classified as grade 3. The mean hospital stay was 1.16 days. While 5 of 70 patients with Grade 2 hemorrhoids could not be followed up after surgery, 24 were followed for 6 months and 41 for 1 year. One (1.42%) patient who attended the 1-year follow-up showed recurrence. Four patients (9.52%) showed recurrence. One patient with grade 3 hemorrhoids experienced postoperative bleeding lasting one week, requiring erythrocyte suspension transfusion. Another patient with grade 3 hemorrhoids developed a hematoma, which resolved with conservative treatment. Eight patients (7.14%) with grade 3 hemorrhoids developed postoperative edema, all of whom improved with conservative treatment. Pain, evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale, was measured as 2.03 on the first postoperative day and 1.49 on the second postoperative day. Conclusion: LH treatment has been found to be a successful alternative treatment option for Grade 2 and Grade 3 diseases. It is emphasized that patient selection is crucial in LH treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Sandler RS, Peery AF. Rethinking what we know about hemorrhoids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 8–15.
  2. Ganz RA. The evaluation and treatment of hemorrhoids: a guide for the gastroenterologist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 593–603.
  3. Di Costanzo GG, Tortora R, D’Adamo G, De Luca M, Lampasi F, Addario L, et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus laser ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 30: 559–65.
  4. Lee T, Mendhiratta N, Sperling D, Lepor H. Focal laser ablation for localized prostate cancer: principles, clinical trials, and our initial experience. Rev Urol 2014; 16: 55–66.
  5. Salfi R. A new technique for ambulatory hemorrhoidal treatment. Coloproctology 2009; 31: 99–103.
  6. Plapler H, Hage R, Duarte J, Lopes N, Masson I, Cazarini C, et al. A new method for hemorrhoid surgery: intrahemorrhoidal diode laser, does it work? Photomed Laser Surg 2009; 27: 819–23.
  7. Longchamp G, Liot E, Meyer J, Toso C, Buchs NC, Ris F. Non-excisional laser therapies for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci 2021; 36: 485–96.
  8. Crea N, Pata G, Lippa M, Tamburini AM, Berjaoui AH. Hemorrhoid laser procedure (HeLP) for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: results from a long-term follow-up analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2022; 37: 309–15.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

General Practice , Patient Safety

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 29, 2024

Submission Date

March 3, 2024

Acceptance Date

March 23, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 46 Number: 1

AMA
1.Genç HÇ, Çoşkun H, Demirtaş Y, Soylu S, Kurt A. Our Clinic’s Experience with Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty. CMJ. 2024;46(1):74-77. doi:10.7197/cmj.1446187