Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students

İrem Akova; Emine Fincan; Candan Cankı

doi:10.7197/cmj.1916724

EN TR

Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the ambivalent sexism and gender awareness levels of medical students who will serve society as future physicians and to examine the relationship between these two attitudes. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 404 medical students between May 15, 2025, and June 10, 2025. A sociodemographic data form, the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI), and the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS) were used. Results: Of the students, 57.7% were female, and the mean age was 22.2±2.8 years. The students' mean scores were 3.1 ± 1.1 for hostile sexism, 3.2 ± 1.1 for protective sexism, 4.1 ± 0.5 for gender sensitivity, 2.7 ± 0.9 for gender-role ideology towards patients, and 2.7 ± 0.9 for gender-role ideology towards physicians. There was a high positive correlation between gender-role ideology towards patients and physicians and each of the sub-dimensions of the ASI (hostile and protective sexism) (p < 0.001 for each). Conclusion: This study reveals the clinical significance of the relationship between gender discrimination and gender awareness among medical students. It is believed that structured gender education integrated into the medical education curriculum will contribute to students providing equitable and ethical healthcare free from clinical biases.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval (Decision no. 2025-04/09, Date: 24.04.2025) from the Sivas Cumhuriyet University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee was received for the study. The participants were informed about the study, and their informed consent was obtained.

Tıp öğrencilerinde çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ve cinsiyet farkındalığının incelenmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı geleceğin hekimleri olarak topluma hizmet verecek olan tıp öğrencilerinin nasıl bir cinsiyetçi tutuma sahip olduğunu ve cinsiyet farkındalığı düzeyini belirlemek ve bu iki tutum arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemekti. Metot: Kesitsel tipteki bu çalışma 15 Mayıs 2025- 10 Haziran 2025 tarihleri arasında 404 tıp öğrencisiyle yürütüldü. Sosyodemografik veri formu, Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Ölçeği (ÇDCÖ) ve Nijmegen Tıpta Cinsiyet Farkındalığı Ölçeği (N-GAMS) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin %57.7’si kadındı, yaş ortalaması 22,2±2,8 idi. Öğrencilerin puan ortalamaları düşmanca cinsiyetçilik için 3,1 ± 1,1, korumacı cinsiyetçilik için 3,2 ± 1,1, toplumsal cinsiyet duyarlılığı için 4,1 ± 0,5, hastalara yönelik toplumsal cinsiyet ideolojisi için 2,7 ± 0,9 ve hekimlere yönelik toplumsal cinsiyet ideolojisi için 2,7 ± 0,9 idi. Hastalara ve hekimlere yönelik toplumsal cinsiyet ideolojisi ile ÇDCÖ alt boyutlarının her biri (düşmanca ve korumacı cinsiyetçilik) arasında pozitif yönde yüksek korelasyon vardı (her biri için p < 0,001). Sonuç: Bu çalışma tıp öğrencilerinde cinsiyetçi tutumlar ile cinsiyet farkındalığı arasındaki ilişkinin klinik açıdan önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Tıp eğitim müfredatına entegre edilecek yapılandırılmış toplumsal cinsiyet eğitimlerinin, öğrencilerin klinik önyargılardan arınmış, eşitlikçi ve etik bir sağlık hizmeti sunmalarına katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

References

1. Sakallı-Uğurlu N. Çelişik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Türk Psikol Derg. 2002;17(49):47-58.
2. Fiske ST, Xu J, Cuddy AC, Glick P. (Dis)respecting versus (Dis)liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth. J Soc Issues. 1999;55(3):473-489. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00128
3. Glick P, Fiske ST. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70(3):491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
4. Glick P, Diebold J, Bailey-Werner B, Zhu L. The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward Women. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1997;23(12):1323-1334. doi:10.1177/01461672972312009
5. Beydoğan B. Attitudes toward Women in Managerial Positions: The Effects of Ambivalent Sexism, Patriarchy and Gender Differences on These Attitudes. (M.S. - Master of Science) Middle East Technical University.; 2001.
6. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):565-582. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0
7. Christiansen DM, Berke ET. Gender- and Sex-Based Contributors to Sex Differences in PTSD. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020;22(4):19. doi:10.1007/s11920-020-1140-y
8. Lam CSP, Arnott C, Beale AL, Chandramouli C, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Kaye DM, Ky B, Santema BT, Sliwa K, Voors AA. Sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(47):3859-3868c. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz835

9. Blanton HL, Barnes RC, McHann MC, Bilbrey JA, Wilkerson JL, Guindon J. Sex differences and the endocannabinoid system in pain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021;202:173107. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173107
10. Biskup E, Marra AM, Ambrosino I, et al. Awareness of sex and gender dimensions among physicians: the European federation of internal medicine assessment of gender differences in Europe (EFIM-IMAGINE) survey. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17(5):1395-1404. doi:10.1007/s11739-022-02951-9
11. Gattino S, De Piccoli N, Grosso M, Miozzo S, Tanturri G, Rollero C. Awareness of gender medicine among family doctors. A field investigation. J Prev Interv Community. 2020;48(2):147-160. doi:10.1080/10852352.2019.1624354
12. Arda B. Is There Any Room for Women in Medical Research? Bioethical Concerns. Balkan Med J. 2019;37(2):58-59. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2020.2.001
13. Verdonk P, Benschop YWM, De Haes HCJM, Lagro-Janssen TLM. Medical Students’ Gender Awareness. Sex Roles. 2008;58(3-4):222-234. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9326-x
14. Yılmaz Karaman İG, Yastıbaş C, Altınöz AE, Örnekel İN, Bilgin M, Güleç G. Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale: Assessment of Validity and Reliability. Konuralp Tıp Derg. 2023;15(3):429-437. doi:10.18521/ktd.1294869
15. Morais R, Bernardes SF, Verdonk P. Gender awareness in medicine: adaptation and validation of the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale to the Portuguese population (N-GAMS). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(2):457-477. doi:10.1007/s10459-019-09936-y
16. Gattino S, Piccoli N De, Grosso M, Miozzo S, Tanturri G. Gender awareness in medicine, sexism and empathy. A comparison between professionals and general practitioners in training. Psicol Della Salut. 2019;3:7-27. doi:10.3280/PDS2019-003002
17. Kurnaz Ay M, Davun S, Hidiroğlu S, Deniz Ç, Çebi I, Engin D, Karabakal I, Karavuş M. Evaluation of gender awareness among medical students in İstanbul. J Exp Clin Med. 2023;40(2):300-306. doi:10.52142/omujecm.40.2.19
18. Wortmann L, Haarmann L, Yeboah A, Kalbe E. Gender medicine teaching increases medical students’ gender awareness: results of a quantitative survey. GMS Journal Med Educ. 2023;40(4):1-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001627
19. Maxwell E, Sheppard G, Yi Y. A survey of undergraduate medical students’ knowledge and attitudes about gender bias: the Newfoundland and Labrador perspective. Can Med Educ J. 2024;15(1):48-55. doi:10.36834/cmej.75919
20. Savarese G, Carpinelli L, Stornaiuolo G, Bifulco S, Bruno G, Navarra M. Gender Representations, Empathy, and Gender-Based Violence Awareness Among Medical Students: A Proposal for a Specific Training Program. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e65266. doi:10.7759/cureus.65266
21. Huck SW. Reading Statistics and Research. 6th ed.; 2012.
22. Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V. Biyoistatistik. 10th ed. (Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V, eds.). Hatiboğlu yayınları; 2002.
23. Bert F, Boietti E, Rousset S, Pompili E, Franzini Tibaldeo E, Gea M, Scaioli G, Siliquini R. Gender sensitivity and stereotypes in medical university students: An Italian cross-sectional study. Jacobsen R, ed. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0262324. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262324
24. Pragjna V, Shandilya V, Pandey V, Sushma K, Gandhi AP. Gender awareness among the undergraduate medical students: A cross sectional study from Hyderabad, India. Indian J Med Ethics. 2024;9(3):193-201. doi:10.20529/IJME.2024.033
25. Goussault-Capmas P, Panjo H, Pelletier-Fleury N. Gender awareness among general practitioners in France: a cross sectional study using the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS). Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):5733. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56396-5
26. Rrustemi I, Locatelli I, Schwarz J, Lagro-Janssen T, Fauvel A, Clair C. Gender awareness among medical students in a Swiss University. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):156. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02037-0
27. Zhang LL, Dou JH, Sun L, Lu GH. Impact of Gender-Role Attitudes and Mental Health on Hostile Sexism and Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(17):1-16. doi:10.1007/s00266-024-04028-8

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

General Practice

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

İrem Akova ^*
0000-0002-2672-8863
Türkiye

Emine Fincan
0009-0008-6252-8480
Türkiye

Candan Cankı
0000-0000-0000-0000
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

March 27, 2026

Acceptance Date

June 1, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 48 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1916724

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA74PR92NC

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Akova, İ., Fincan, E., & Cankı, C. (2026). Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, 48(2), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1916724

AMA

1.Akova İ, Fincan E, Cankı C. Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students. CMJ. 2026;48(2):61-68. doi:10.7197/cmj.1916724

Chicago

Akova, İrem, Emine Fincan, and Candan Cankı. 2026. “Examining Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Awareness Among Medical Students”. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 48 (2): 61-68. https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1916724.

EndNote

Akova İ, Fincan E, Cankı C (June 1, 2026) Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 48 2 61–68.

IEEE

[1]İ. Akova, E. Fincan, and C. Cankı, “Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students”, CMJ, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 61–68, June 2026, doi: 10.7197/cmj.1916724.

ISNAD

Akova, İrem - Fincan, Emine - Cankı, Candan. “Examining Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Awareness Among Medical Students”. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 48/2 (June 1, 2026): 61-68. https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1916724.

JAMA

1.Akova İ, Fincan E, Cankı C. Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students. CMJ. 2026;48:61–68.

MLA

Akova, İrem, et al. “Examining Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Awareness Among Medical Students”. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, vol. 48, no. 2, June 2026, pp. 61-68, doi:10.7197/cmj.1916724.

Vancouver

1.İrem Akova, Emine Fincan, Candan Cankı. Examining ambivalent sexism and gender awareness among medical students. CMJ. 2026 Jun. 1;48(2):61-8. doi:10.7197/cmj.1916724