Research Article

Analysis of cases diagnosed with fetal intracranial anomalies of a Tertiary Care Center

Volume: 39 Number: 3 September 19, 2017
  • Savas Karakus
  • Serife Özlem Genc
  • Tahsin Takci
  • Huseyin Bozkurt
  • Begum Kurt
  • Ali Cetin
EN TR

Analysis of cases diagnosed with fetal intracranial anomalies of a Tertiary Care Center

Abstract

Objective: Our aim is to evaluate the analysis of perinatal characteristics of cases diagnosed with fetal intracranial anomaly of tertiary care center over the last 10 years.

Method: A cross-sectional study of 59 pregnant women diagnosed with fetal brain anomalies between 11 and 33 weeks of gestational age (GA).  The data were collected from the archive. After that, intracranial anomalies were divided into subtypes and how often they are seen. Descriptive statistics of collected variables were calculated.

Results: 59 cases were diagnosed with an average of 19.3 ± 5.4 weeks of gestational age. Karyotype abnormality was detected in 18.6% of cases. The most common intracranial anomalies in our study were ventriculomegaly (35.6%), Arnold Chiari malformation (20.3%) and encephalocele (20.3%).

Conclusions: Despite the challenges of early gestation, accuracy in diagnosing and counseling to family for fetal brain anomalies before 24 weeks' GA was high. A multidisciplinary approach involving pediatrics, genetics, and neurosurgery, radiology, and obstetrics and gynecology departments is crucial for counseling on perinatal diagnosis. 

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Köşüş A, Köşüş N, Usluoğulları B, Duran M, Turhan NÖ, Tekşam M. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric practice. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2011; 12: 39-46.
  2. 2. Garcia-Flores J, Recio M, Uriel M, Cañamares M, Cruceyra M, Tamarit I, Carrascoso J, Espada M, Sáinz de la Cuesta R. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and neurosonography in congenital neurological anomalies: supplementary diagnostic and postnatal prognostic value. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 1517-23.
  3. 3. Trudell AS, Odibo AO. Diagnosis of spina bifida on ultrasound: always termination? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28: 367-77.
  4. 4. Kahn L, Mbabuike N, Valle-Giler EP, Garces J, Moore RC, Hilaire HS, Bui CJ. Fetal surgery: the ochsner experience with in utero spina bifida repair. Ochsner J 2014; 14: 112-8.
  5. 5. Balakumar K. Antenatal ultrasound screening for anomalies among singletons- results of a prospective study. Calicut Medical Journal 2004; 2: 1-10
  6. 6. Davies V, Gledhill J, McFadyen A, Whitlow B, Economides D. Psychological outcome in women undergoing termination of pregnancy for ultrasound-detected fetal anomaly in the first and second trimesters: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 389-92.
  7. 7. lknur Gümüş, Atalay Ekin, Ceren Gölbaşı, Ezgi Hürcan, Cüneyt Eftal Taner. Evaluating 101 cases with the anomaly of fetal central nervous system. Perinatal Journal 2016; 24: 136-141
  8. 8. Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV, Filly RA, Broderick KC, Musci TJ, Barkovich AJ. Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 1688-98.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Serife Özlem Genc

Tahsin Takci

Huseyin Bozkurt

Begum Kurt

Ali Cetin

Publication Date

September 19, 2017

Submission Date

June 20, 2017

Acceptance Date

June 20, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 39 Number: 3

AMA
1.Karakus S, Genc SÖ, Takci T, Bozkurt H, Kurt B, Cetin A. Analysis of cases diagnosed with fetal intracranial anomalies of a Tertiary Care Center. CMJ. 2017;39(3):597-601. doi:10.7197/223.v39i31705.347459