Research Article

The effect of appendix diameter on perforation in acute appendicitis cases

Volume: 41 Number: 2 June 30, 2019
EN

The effect of appendix diameter on perforation in acute appendicitis cases

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to examine the association between appendix diameter and perforation and to show the significance of appendix diameter in acute appendicitis cases.

Method: The data of 286 cases who were older than 18 years of age and who were operated in a tertiary hospital between 2017 and 2018 with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis were examined retrospectively. The patients’ ages, genders, pathology results, appendix diameter at abdominal tomography, white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values were analyzed. The patients were grouped in three as perforated, non-perforated and negative appendectomy group.

Results: Of the 286 patients operated with a diagnosis of AA, 166 (58%) were male, while 122 (42%) were female and average age of the patients was 37±16.79 years. Non-perforated group consisted of 194 patients, while perforated group consisted of 56 patients and negative appendectomy group consisted of 36 patients. Average appendix diameter of the patients was 8.84±3.29 mm, while average WBC value was 13071±3726/mm3 and average CRP value was 3.44±5.15mg/L. When the patients’ appendix diameters and CRP values were compared, statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p<0.001). Average value of white blood cell was the lowest in negative appendectomy group, while it was the highest in perforated group. There was a statistically significant difference between negative appendectomy group and the other two groups in terms of white blood cell (p<0.001). There was a positive correlation between the groups in terms of appendix diameter, white blood cell and CRP  (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Appendix diameter is important in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and detection of perforated appendicitis. Appendix diameter is correlated with white blood cell and CRP. 

Keywords

Thanks

We thank radiologist Dr. Serdar Altay for their help in this study.

References

  1. Referans1. Sarac M, Bakal Ü, Tartar T, Kazez A. The Role of the Doctors in Perforated Appendicitis. Firat Med J 2014;19:126-29.
  2. Referans2. Akay S., Akay H, Vardar E, Erkul Z. Comparison of Eosinophil Values with Other Biomarkers in Predicting Perforation of Acute Appendicitis. Eurasian J Emerg Med 2017; 16: 8-11.
  3. Referans3. Aygun A, Katipoglu B, Imamoglu M, Demir S, Yadigaroglu M, Tatli O, et al. Diagnostic Value of Plasma Pentraxin-3 in Acute Appendicitis. J Invest Surg. 2017;11:1-6.
  4. Referans4. Mengucuk ME, Ayten R, Bulbuller N, Godekmerdan A, Basbug M, Mungan I. The place of serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and neopterin in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Firat Med. J. 2010;15(1):40–43.
  5. Referans5. Yildirim O, Solak C, Koçer B, Unal B , Karabeyoglu M , Bozkurt B , et al. The role of serum inflammatory markers in acute appendicitis and their success in preventing negative laparotomy. J Invest Surg. 2006;19:345–352.
  6. Referans6. Gokce AH, Aren A, Gokce FS, Dursun N, Barut AY. Reliability of ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011;17(1):19–22
  7. Referans7. Binnebosel M, Otto J, Stumpf M, Mahnken AH, Gassler N, Schumpelick V, et al. Acute appendicitis. Modern diagnostics-surgical ultrasound. Chirurg. 2009 Jul;80(7):579–87.
  8. Referans8. Birnbaum BA, and. Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the Millennium. Radiology. 2000; 215:337-348.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2019

Submission Date

May 20, 2019

Acceptance Date

June 24, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 41 Number: 2

AMA
1.Katipoglu B, Aygun A, Çınar H. The effect of appendix diameter on perforation in acute appendicitis cases. CMJ. 2019;41(2):392-397. doi:10.7197/223.vi.567892

Cited By