Review

A short review on the comparison of consultation systems and tools in the emergency department practice: Tele-consultation

Volume: 41 Number: 2 June 30, 2019
EN

A short review on the comparison of consultation systems and tools in the emergency department practice: Tele-consultation

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) consultation is an important part of acute patient care and one of the major determinants of ED length of stay (LOS). ED consultations between physicians who may not be in the same location frequently, require a tool to reach out one another and communicate. This paper reviews the historical change and development of consultation tools. The literature on ED consultation methods have been accumulating for the last two decades as the diversity of these methods has increased with technology. Most of the studies demonstrate that high tech systems are useful and safe to reach the consultant and share medical information flow. Moreover, the future of the area offers new developments regarding consultation tools that are hard to imagine yet like augmented reality.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Chaou CH, Chiu TF, Yen AM, Ng CJ, Chen HH. Analyzing Factors Affecting Emergency Department Length of Stay-Using a Competing Risk-accelerated Failure Time Model. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(14):e3263. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000003263. Pubmed PMID:27057879.
  2. 2. Yoon, P, Steiner, IP, Reinhardt, G. Analysis of factors influencing length of stay in the emergency department. CJEM. 2003;5:155. DOI:10.1017/S1481803500006539. Pubmed PMID:17472779.
  3. 3. Pines JM, Prabhu A, Hilton JA, Hollander JE, Datner EM. The effect of emergency department crowding on length of stay and medication treatment times in discharged patients with acute asthma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:834–839. DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00780.x. Pubmed PMID:20670320.
  4. 4. McCarthy ML, Zeger SL, Ding R, Levin SR, Desmond JS, Lee J, Aronsky D. Crowding delays treatment and lengthens emergency department length of stay, even among high-acuity patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;54(4):492-503.e4. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.006. Pubmed PMID: 19423188.
  5. 5. Bernstein, S, Aronsky, D, Duseja, R, Epstein S, Handel D, Hwang U et al. The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2009;16:1– 10. DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x. Pubmed PMID:19007346.
  6. 6. Kreindler SA, Cui Y, Metge CJ, Raynard M. Patient characteristics associated with longer emergency department stay: a rapid review. Emerg Med J. 2016 Mar;33(3):194-9. DOI:10.1136/emermed-2015-204913. Pubmed PMID:26341654.
  7. 7. Richardson, DB. Increase in patient mortality at 10 days associated with emergency department overcrowding. Med. J. A. 2006;184:213–216. DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00204.x. Pubmed PMID:16515430.
  8. 8. Vural S, Icme F, Kavakli HS, Tanriverdi F, Karakayali O. A comparison study on the effectiveness of pager and telephone systems during emergency department consultations and length of stay of consulted emergency department patients. Turk J Clin Lab 2019; 1: 12-17. DOI:10.18663/tjcl.336946.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

June 30, 2019

Submission Date

May 21, 2019

Acceptance Date

May 24, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 41 Number: 2

AMA
1.Vural S, Ramadan H. A short review on the comparison of consultation systems and tools in the emergency department practice: Tele-consultation. CMJ. 2019;41(2):239-243. doi:10.7197/223.vi.568582

Cited By