EN
The effect of two different types of electric current on experimental pain threshold in healthy individuals: A double blind, randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: Physiotherapists often resort to electrophysical agents for pain management.
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of acupuncture-like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on experimental pressure pain threshold (PPT) in healthy individuals.
Method: Sixty one healthy participants (44 females, 17 males) aged 18-21 years were included in the study.The participants were divided into acupuncture-like TENS and NMES groups. The application was performed for 20 minutes from the right upper limb. The PPT changes of the participants were evaluated from the thenar part of both hands with an algometer before the current application, immediately after and 60 minutes after.
Results: There was no difference in the PPT levels of the right and left extremities of the participants in both groups before the application (p>0.05). In both groups and intergroup comparisons, there was no difference in PPT levels measured from the right and left extremities of participants before the current application, immediately after and 60 minutes after the current application (p>0.05).
Conclusions: In this study, it was concluded that acupuncture-like TENS and NMES had no effect on experimental PPT and therefore, the clinical use of currents should be questioned.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Scientific Research Project Fund of Sivas Cumhuriyet University
Project Number
SBF-66
References
- 1. Mittrach R, Grill E, Walchner-Bonjean M, Scheuringer M, Boldt C, Huber EO, Stucki, G. Goals of physiotherapy interventions can be described using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Physiother. 2008;94:150-7.
- 2. Ginnerup-Nielsen E, Christensen R, Thorborg K, Tarp S, Henriksen M. Physiotherapy for pain: a meta-epidemiological study of randomised trials. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:965-71.
- 3. Fırat T, Meriç A, Kırdı N. Magnetoterapi ve ultrason uygulamalarının deneysel ağrı üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması: tek kör klinik çalışma. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2009;20:178-83.
- 4. Springer S, Laufer Y, Elboim-Gabyzon M. Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey. Israel journal of health policy research. 2015;4:14.
- 5. Johnson MI. Pain Management and Clinical Effectiweness of TENS. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;29:1-4
- 6. McDenough S. Neuromuscular and Muscular Electrical Stimulation. Watson T. (Eds.) Electrotherapy E-Book: evidence-based practice. 12th Ed. Philedelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008; pp 231-252
- 7. Kırdı N. Nöromusküler Elektrik Stimulasyonu. Şimşek N, Kırdı N. (Eds.) Elektroterapide Temel Prensipler ve Klinik Uygulamalar. 1st Ed. Ankara: Pelikan Yayıncılık; 2015; pp 119-126.
- 8. Baydoğan Arman N. Nöromusküler Elektriksel Stimulasyon. Razak Özdinçler A. (Eds.) Fiziksel Modaliteler ve Elektroterapi. 1st ed. İstanbul: İstanbul Medikal Sağlık ve Yayıncılık Hiz. Tic. Ltd. Şti; 2014; pp 139-148.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
May 20, 2020
Submission Date
January 17, 2020
Acceptance Date
May 11, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 42 Number: 1