Research Article

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Glasgow Coma Scale and Parameters in the Decision Phase of Rapid Sequence Intubation in Altered Mental Status Developing During the Emergency Room Follow-up of Non-Traumatic Patients

Volume: 44 Number: 2 June 30, 2022
EN

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Glasgow Coma Scale and Parameters in the Decision Phase of Rapid Sequence Intubation in Altered Mental Status Developing During the Emergency Room Follow-up of Non-Traumatic Patients

Abstract

Abstract: Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is one of the most important parameters in deciding rapid sequential intubation (RSI) in emergency department (ED). The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the GCS and each of its parameters in making RSI decisions in non-traumatic patients brought to the ED.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in an ED of a tertiary training and research hospital, which accepts approximately 250.000 patients annually. The value of GCS and GCS parameters in deciding to intubation in patients with an RSI indication was compared with the Pearson χ2 test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for assessment of combinations of GCS parameters.
Results: A total of 276 patients were included in the study. It was found that the mortality rates was statistically significantly higher in the cases with GCS 4-10 (including) in the combinations with the low motor response. Motor scoring was more statistically significant for mortality in the evaluation made by creating 120 combinations between the remaining 4-14 GCS scores after the 3 and 15 GCS scores of the cases were removed from the GCS scores.
Conclusion: It was found that the motor response showed more linear progress compared to the verbal response and eye response evaluation, and the other parameters were not linear in the evaluation between the GCS total score and GCS combinations of the cases. Motor response was determinant in the total GCS score.

Keywords

References

  1. Referans1. Mahler ME. Neurological emergencies. Yoshikawa TT, Norman DC, eds. Acute Emergencies and Critical Care of the Geriatric Patient. 1nci baskı. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 2000:369-83.
  2. Referans2.Fitch MT. Altered Mental Status in the Elderly: Neurologic Nightmares. Presentation at Boston Scientific Assembly, October 2009, www.acep.org/workarea/downloadasset.aspx?id=46370.
  3. Referans3. T Bein, K Taeger. Score systems in emergency medicine. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1993 Jun; 28 (4):222-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998911.
  4. Referans4. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985; 13:818–826.
  5. Referans5. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13; 2(7872):81-4.
  6. Referans6. C. Healey, Turner M. Osler, Frederick B. Rogers et al. Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale Score: Motor Score Alone Is a Better Predictor. The Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. Vol54 Nbr 4 Doi: 10.1097 /01. TA. 0000058130. 30490.5D
  7. Referans7. Florence C.M. Reith, Hester F. Lingsma, Belinda J.Gabbe et all.Differential effects of the Glasgow Coma Scale Score and its Components: An analysis of 54 069 patients with traumatic brain injury.Injury, Int. J. Care Injured S0020-1383(17)30363-7
  8. Referans8. Prasad K, Menon GR. Comparison of the three strategies of verbal scoring of the Glasgow Coma Scale in patients with stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 1998; 8:79– 85.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

June 1, 2021

Acceptance Date

June 12, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 44 Number: 2

AMA
1.Sezer Çınaroğlu O, Yamanoğlu A, Payza U, et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Glasgow Coma Scale and Parameters in the Decision Phase of Rapid Sequence Intubation in Altered Mental Status Developing During the Emergency Room Follow-up of Non-Traumatic Patients. CMJ. 2022;44(2):204-210. doi:10.7197/cmj.946402