Case Report

C2 transpedicular fixation technique in Hangman's Fracture

Volume: 43 Number: 4 December 31, 2021
EN

C2 transpedicular fixation technique in Hangman's Fracture

Abstract

Objective : Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis, also known as hangman fractures, all cervical it accounts for 4-7% of all traumas and is the second most common axis after odontoid fractures. trauma. There are unstable fractures and the treatment options are immobilization with halo or surgery.
is stabilization. By most authors, it is primarily associated with halo in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 fractures.Although external fixation and immobilization are recommended, halon is a difficult orthosis to use.
Because of this, segmental motion sparing surgery provides rapid recovery in suitable patients may be an option. In the case we presented, the treatment approach in Hangman's fractures was reviewed in the literature.
has been reviewed and discussed.
Clinical Presentation: Our case, after AITC, with Levin Edwards Type 1A Hangman fracture, A 40-year-old female patient with no neurological deficits. The patient does not prefer to use a halo orthosis C2 transpedicular surgery was performed with a lag screw for motion-sparing surgery to a young patient fixation is planned.
Technique: C2 transpedicular lag screw was applied to the patient with intraoperative fluoroscopy.
Conclusion: C2 transpedicular fixation with Lag screw, according to posterior segmental stabilization a more minimally invasive and motion-sparing surgery, faster recovery time may be preferred to traditional posterior stabilization methods in selected patient groups due to The patient who did not prefer the use of orthoses due to the social disadvantages of immobilization with Halo it is a quick and cost-effective surgical option in groups with a rapid recovery time.

Keywords

References

  1. 1] Schneider RC, Livingston KE, Cave AJ, et al. “Hangman’s fracture” of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg. 1965;22:141–154.
  2. [2] Effendi B, Roy D, Cornish B, Dussault RG, Laurin CA: Fractures of the ring of the axis: A classification based on the analysis of 131 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63B:319–327, 1981
  3. [3] Murphy H, Schroeder GD, Shi WJ, Kepler CK, Kurd MF, Fleischman AN, et al. Management of Hangman’s fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31(Suppl 4):S90–5.
  4. [4] Levine AM, Edwards CC: The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67A:217– 226, 1985
  5. [5] X.F. Li, L.Y. Dai, H. Lu, X.D. Chen, A systematic review of the management of hangman’s fractures, Eur. Spine J. 15 (3) (2006) 257–269.
  6. [6] J.J. Shin, S.H. Kim, Y.E. Cho, S.H. Cheshier, J. Park, Primary surgical management by reduction and fixation of unstable hangman’s fractures with discoligamentous instability or combined fractures: clinical article, J. Neurosurg. Spine 19 (5) (2013) 569–575.
  7. [7] Leconte P. Fracture et luxation des deux premières vertèbres cervicales. In: Judet R, editor. Luxation Congenénitale de la Hanche: Fractures du Cou-de-pied Rachis Cervical. Actualités de Chirurgie Orthopédique de l’Hö pital Raymond-Poincaré. Paris: Masson et Cie; 1964. pp. 147–166
  8. [8] Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, et al. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 1991; 4:286–95.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Case Report

Publication Date

December 31, 2021

Submission Date

August 11, 2021

Acceptance Date

December 31, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 43 Number: 4

AMA
1.Küçükyıldız HC, Karademir M, Güneş G, Özüm Ü. C2 transpedicular fixation technique in Hangman’s Fracture. CMJ. 2021;43(4):431-436. doi:10.7197/cmj.981538