EN
Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters
Öz
Objective: In patients with and without a diagnosis of hypertension, we sought to ascertain if body mass index (BMI) and other demographic information affected dipper/non-dipper and pulse pressure/pulse pressure index.
Method: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) analysis of 56 patients with hypertension and 91 patients without hypertension were evaluated. We defined dipper as a drop in mean nocturnal blood pressure (BP) of >10% as compared with mean daytime values (non-dipper percentage <10%). The same calculations were made for the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Pulse pressure (PP) and pulse pressure index were calculated using blood pressure measurements.
Results: Systolic dipper was observed in 35.7% of male patients and 25% of female patients in the hypertension group (group 1), and there was no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). Diastolic dipper was observed in 46.4% of male patients and 39.3% of female patients in the hypertension group, and there was no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). In examination cases (group 2), Although the incidence of systolic dipper and diastolic dipper in male subjects (46.5% and 60.5%, respectively) was higher than in female subjects (27.1% and 39.6%, respectively), this difference was close to significance, but not statistically significant (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean age and BMI of systolic dipper and non-dipper cases (p>0.05). Besides, the mean age of the diastolic non-dipper cases was statistically significantly higher than the diastolic dipper cases (p:0.048), and the mean BMI of the diastolic non-dipper cases was statistically significantly higher than the diastolic dipper cases (p:0.034).
Conclusion: It may be beneficial to include the mean pulse pressure/pulse pressure index in the evaluation of general, awake and asleep pulse pressure while evaluating the ABPM result.
Method: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) analysis of 56 patients with hypertension and 91 patients without hypertension were evaluated. We defined dipper as a drop in mean nocturnal blood pressure (BP) of >10% as compared with mean daytime values (non-dipper percentage <10%). The same calculations were made for the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Pulse pressure (PP) and pulse pressure index were calculated using blood pressure measurements.
Results: Systolic dipper was observed in 35.7% of male patients and 25% of female patients in the hypertension group (group 1), and there was no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). Diastolic dipper was observed in 46.4% of male patients and 39.3% of female patients in the hypertension group, and there was no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). In examination cases (group 2), Although the incidence of systolic dipper and diastolic dipper in male subjects (46.5% and 60.5%, respectively) was higher than in female subjects (27.1% and 39.6%, respectively), this difference was close to significance, but not statistically significant (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean age and BMI of systolic dipper and non-dipper cases (p>0.05). Besides, the mean age of the diastolic non-dipper cases was statistically significantly higher than the diastolic dipper cases (p:0.048), and the mean BMI of the diastolic non-dipper cases was statistically significantly higher than the diastolic dipper cases (p:0.034).
Conclusion: It may be beneficial to include the mean pulse pressure/pulse pressure index in the evaluation of general, awake and asleep pulse pressure while evaluating the ABPM result.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1- Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Whelton PK, He J. Worldwide prevalence of hypertension: a systematic review. J Hypertens. 2004;22(1):11-9.
- 2- Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 287: 1003-1010.
- 3- Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365: 217–223
- 4- Ünüvar N, Mollahaliloğlu S, Yardım N. Sağlık Bakanlığı Hastalık Yükü Çalışması, Ankara Türkiye 2006, T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Refik Saydam Hıfzısıhha Merkezi Başkanlığı, Hıfzısıhha Mektebi Müdürlüğü, ISBN: 975-590-198-1. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 701 HM Yayın No: SB-HM-2007/11, Ankara: Aydoğdu Ofset Matbaacılık San ve Tic Ltd Şti 1. Basım 2007.
- 5- Ostchega Y, Dillon C, Hughes J, Carroll M, Yoon S: Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in older U.S. adults: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988 to 2004. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007; 55(7):1056-1065
- 6- O'Brien E, Sheridan J, O' Malley K. Dippers and non-dippers. Lancet 1988; 2: 397-400.
- 7- Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, Dinccag N, Karsidag K, Genc S, Telci A, Canbaz B, Turker F,Yilmaz T, Cakir B, Tuomilehto J. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. European journal of epidemiology. 2013;28:169-180.
- 8- Arici M, Altun B, Erdem Y, Derici Ü, NergizoğluG, Turgan Ç, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Turkey (the Paten T study) in 2003. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1817-1823.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Ekim 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
15 Eylül 2022
Kabul Tarihi
26 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 3
APA
Orhanoğlu, T., & Doğan, Z. (2022). Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, 44(3), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1175932
AMA
1.Orhanoğlu T, Doğan Z. Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters. CMJ. 2022;44(3):261-267. doi:10.7197/cmj.1175932
Chicago
Orhanoğlu, Timur, ve Zeki Doğan. 2022. “Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters”. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 44 (3): 261-67. https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1175932.
EndNote
Orhanoğlu T, Doğan Z (01 Ekim 2022) Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 44 3 261–267.
IEEE
[1]T. Orhanoğlu ve Z. Doğan, “Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters”, CMJ, c. 44, sy 3, ss. 261–267, Eki. 2022, doi: 10.7197/cmj.1175932.
ISNAD
Orhanoğlu, Timur - Doğan, Zeki. “Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters”. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal 44/3 (01 Ekim 2022): 261-267. https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1175932.
JAMA
1.Orhanoğlu T, Doğan Z. Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters. CMJ. 2022;44:261–267.
MLA
Orhanoğlu, Timur, ve Zeki Doğan. “Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters”. Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, c. 44, sy 3, Ekim 2022, ss. 261-7, doi:10.7197/cmj.1175932.
Vancouver
1.Timur Orhanoğlu, Zeki Doğan. Body Mass Index and other Demographic Data in Relation to Daily Ambulatory Blood Pressure Parameters. CMJ. 01 Ekim 2022;44(3):261-7. doi:10.7197/cmj.1175932