Araştırma Makalesi

MRI EVALUATION OF EXTREMITY SCHWANNOMA CHARACTERISTICS

Cilt: 40 Sayı: 2 5 Haziran 2018
PDF İndir
EN TR

MRI EVALUATION OF EXTREMITY SCHWANNOMA CHARACTERISTICS

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate signal characteristics, soft tissue signs and contrast enhancement patterns of extremity schwannomas with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Material and Methods: The study was comprised of 16 patients with a pathological diagnosis of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor (schwannoma) originated from different extremity regions. All patients had MRI exams. MRIs were evaluated for the signal characteristics, the presence of special signs described for soft tissue tumors, and contrast enhancement patterns of the lesions.

Results: Schwannomas were originated from median nerve (n=7), radial nerve (n=4), femoral nerve (n=2), axillary nerve (n=1), common peroneal nerve (n=1), and posterior tibial nerve (n=1). Four types of signal characteristic were described according to the T1W and T2W MR images. All schwannomas (n=16) had split fat sign,15 of them showed entering-exiting nerve sign, 10 had target sign and 10 had fascicular sign. On contrast enhanced images, 12 of the cases showed peripheral heterogenous enhancement with centrally unenhanced curvilinear areas. Four cases had homogenous contrast enhancement.

Conclusion: Most of the extremity schwannomas have diagnostic signal characteristics, soft tissue signs and contrast enhancement patterns on MRI. Preoperative MRI diagnosis of these lesions can reduce the necessity of biopsy and prevent the possibility of nerve fascicle injury.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Forthman CL, Blazar PE. Nerve tumors of the hand and upper extremity. Hand Clin 2004;20:233–242.
  2. 2. Murphey MD, Smith WS, Smith SE, Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT. From the archives of the AFIP. Imaging of musculoskeletal neurogenic tumors: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999;19:1253–1280.
  3. 3. Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer 1986;57:2006–2021.
  4. 4. Zhang Z, Deng L, Ding L, Meng Q. MR imaging differentiation of malignant soft tissue tumors from peripheral schwannomas with large size and heterogeneous signal intensity. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:940–946.
  5. 5. Hems TEJ, Burge PD, Wilson DJ. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of peripheral nerve tumors. J Hand Surg 1997;22:57–60.
  6. 6. Park MJ, Seo KN, Kang HJ. Neurological deficit after surgical enucleation of schwannomasof the upper limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1482–1486.
  7. 7. Isobe K, Tominaga S, Tsutomu A, Hiroyuki K. Imaging of ancient schwannoma. Am J Radiol 2004;183:331–336.
  8. 8. Adani R, Tarallo L, Mugnai, Colopi S. Schwannomas of the upper extremity: analysis of 34 cases. Acta Neurochir 2014;156:2325-2330.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

5 Haziran 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Şubat 2018

Kabul Tarihi

9 Nisan 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 40 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Koç A. MRI EVALUATION OF EXTREMITY SCHWANNOMA CHARACTERISTICS. CMJ. 2018;40(2):115-119. doi:10.7197/223.v40i37154.397616

Cited By