Araştırma Makalesi

THE EFFECT OF UNDERGONE BYPASS SURGERY ON THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION RESULTS/DOES PREVIOUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY COMPLICATE THE SUBSEQUENT PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION?

Cilt: 40 Sayı: 4 29 Aralık 2018
PDF İndir
EN

THE EFFECT OF UNDERGONE BYPASS SURGERY ON THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION RESULTS/DOES PREVIOUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY COMPLICATE THE SUBSEQUENT PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION?

Abstract

Background: Recurrent revascularization is frequently needed in despite to the modern treatment options of coronary artery disease. Recurrent revascularization has need special caution in the setting of previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). There is no study to investigate possible adverse effects of prior CABG on percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). This study investigated that PCI results of the patients with prior CABG.

Methods: Patients who underwent PCI screened retrospectively. Consecutive 100 patients had been prior PCI (group 1), and 100 patients had been prior CABG (group 2) were enrolled to the study. The patients were not enrolled in the study; index PCI underwent bypass graft or total occluded lesion or instant lesion or in the setting of ST elevation myocardial infarction or bifurcation stenting was done.

Results:

Group 1 and group 2 were similar in terms of age and gender. No statistically significant difference was observed between other demographic features. The lesion severity was not significantly different between the groups. In the CABG group, the intervention was more frequent to the Cx lesion; while in the PCI group, intervention to the LAD lesion was more frequent. Factors that made the procedure difficult were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding lesions longer than 20 mm and diffuse coronary artery disease. Balloon and stenting were more frequent in the CABG group, and direct stenting was more frequent in the PCI group (p<0.05) Balloon dilatation was found to be more frequent in the CABG group. The duration of the procedure, number of angiographic frames and films, amount of contrast material used were significantly higher in the CABG group, as the difference between the two groups was not significant regarding balloon pressures applied during stenting. Previous CABG history was found to be an independent variable for the duration of the procedure and the number of angiographic frames. Prior CABG also has a significant correlation with prolonged intervention duration, radiopaque volume, and cine-angiography film and frame counts when controlling for intervened artery and prior index intervention time interval.

Conclusions: PCI was associated with prolonged intervention duration, higher radiopaque volume and higher radiation exposure when implanted in patients with prior CABG. The physician should be alert and precautionary for more complex PCI in patients with prior CABG.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349:1269–1276.
  2. 2.Brilakis ES, Rao SV, Banerjee S, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):844-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.018.
  3. 3.Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, et al.Previous percutaneous coronary interventions increase mortality and morbidity after coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;93(6):1956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.067.
  4. 4.Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass surgery on survival: an overview of 10-year results from randomized trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344(8922):563–70.
  5. 5.Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Oct;34(4):1262-347.
  6. 6.Loop F, Lytle B, Cosgrove D, Stewart R, Goormastic M, Williams G, Golding L, Gill C, Taylor P, Sheldon W, Proudfit W. Influence of the Internal Mammary Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac Events,NEJM, Vol 314: 1-6,1986.
  7. 7.Sianos, G., Morel, M., Kappetein, A., Morice, M., Colombo, A., Dawkins, K., van den Brand, M., Van Dyck, N., Russell, M., ve Mohr, F.,The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention, 2005. 1: p. 219-227.
  8. 8.Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS); European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, Garg S, Huber K, James S, Knuuti J, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Menicanti L, Ostojic M, Piepoli MF, Pilot C, Pomar JL, Reifart N, Ribichini FL, Schalij MJ, Sergeant P, Serruys PW, Silber S, Sousa Uva M, Taggart D. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(20):2501-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

29 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Kasım 2018

Kabul Tarihi

16 Aralık 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 40 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Balin M. THE EFFECT OF UNDERGONE BYPASS SURGERY ON THE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION RESULTS/DOES PREVIOUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY COMPLICATE THE SUBSEQUENT PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION? CMJ. 2018;40(4):384-391. doi:10.7197/223.vi.478427