Definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy results and side effects in elderly bladder cancer patients
Abstract
Objective: Bladder cancer is most commonly observed in elderly patients. In these patients, it is not always possible to give the necessary treatment for the disease. In this study, definitive radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) results and side effects, as well as prognostic factors, were investigated in elderly bladder cancer patients.
Method: The results of 36 elderly patients who received definitive RT or CRT for bladder cancer between the years 2010–2018 in Sivas Oncology Center of Cumhuriyet University Medical Faculty were analyzed retrospectively.
Results: The median age of the patients was 75 (range, 65–84). Sixteen patients (44%) underwent RT without chemotherapy and 20 patients (56%) received CRT. Complete response was detected in 19 (53%) patients. The median survival was 18 months (range 3–102 months) and the overall 2-year survival rate was 37%. Treatment response (p < .001) and performance status of the patients (p = .001) were found to be statistically significant prognostic factors in patients' survival. However, sex, comorbidity, Charlson Comorbidity index, risk groups, treatment modality (RT vs. CRT), presence of in situ, grade, status of tumor foci (unifocal vs. multifocal), degree of tumor resection in transurethral resection of the bladder (TUR-B, complete vs. incomplete resection), chemotherapy after CRT, concurrent chemotherapy regimen (ciplatin vs.gemcitabine), RT dose (< 60 Gy vs. ≥60 Gy), and the device used in RT (linac vs. TomoTherapy) were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Good performance and completed response to treatment in elderly bladder cancer patients positively affects survival.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- 1. Efstathiou JA and Zietman AL. Bladder Cancer (chapter 54). Gunderson LL and Tepper JE (ed.). Clinical Radiation Oncology (4th Edittion). Elsevier 2016: pp:1096-1120.
- 2. Haskell cancer treatment. 5th ed. Ch. 51. 2001. P:828-45.
- 3. Ro JY, Staerkel GA, Ayala AG. Cytologic and histologic features of superficial bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am 1992;19:435-53.
- 4. Saad A, Hanbury DC, McNicholas TA, Boustead GB, Morgan S, Woodman AC. A study comparing various noninvasive methods of detecting bladder cancer in urine. BJU International 2002;89:369-73.
- 5. Soloway MS, Sofer M, Vaidya A. Contemporary management of stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 2002;167:1573-83.
- 6. Gakis G, Efstathiou J, Lerner SP, et al. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: radical cystectomy and bladder preservation for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. European Urology 2013;63(1):45-57.
- 7. Biagioli MC, Fernandez DC, Spiess PE, Wilder RB. Primary bladder preservation treatment for urothelial bladder cancer. Cancer Control 2013;20(3):188-99.
- 8. Cahn DB, Ristau BT, Ghiraldi EM, et al. Bladder preservation therapy: a review of the literature and future directions. Urology 2016;96:54-61.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Aralık 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
6 Kasım 2019
Kabul Tarihi
28 Kasım 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 41 Sayı: 4