Comparison of alvarado and ripasa scores in patients with acute appendicitis
Abstract
Method: The Alvarado and RIPASA scores of each patient were calculated by the scoring system parameters after the 182 patient files were analyzed retrospectively. At cut-off value of 7.5 for RIPASA score and 7 for Alvarado score, patients were divided into high and low-risk groups. The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and the two scoring systems' effectivity were compared with Chi-square and area under curve analysis.
Results: According to the histological examination 42(23%) patients were not considered as acute appendicitis. RİPASA scoring systems high-risk group classification was better by predicting the acute appendicitis patients (p = 0.001, p <0.05). The area under the curve for RIPASA score calculated as 0.738 and this is statistically significant (p = 0.001; p <0.05). The result was better then the Alvarado AUC score (0,633). Alvarado scoring systems' negative predictive value was higher than the RİPASA score, respectively (58,14%, 32.56%).
Conclusions: It is beneficial to use the RIPASA scoring system for patients in our region to reduce the rate of negative laparotomy and unnecessary surgical procedures in patients admitted to emergency services with the suspicion of acute appendicitis.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- REFERENCES: 1) Anderson KD, Parry RL, O’Neill JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG. Pediatric surgery Mosby-Year Book. 1998; 1369-1379.
- 2) Cev M, Bozfakioğlu Y, Değerli Ü. Apendiks hastalıkları. Cerrahi gastroenteroloji İstanbul Nobel Tıp Kitapevi 1989; 258-73.
- 3) Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 799-804. 4) Baachman LM, Bischof DB, Bischofberger SA, Bonani MG, Osann FM, Steurer J. Systematic quantitative overviews of the literatüre to determine the value of diagnostic tests for predicting acute apendicitis. BMC Surg 2002; 21: 2.
- 5) Reilly BM, Evans AT: Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med 2006, 144: 201-209.
- 6) Anderson RE. Meta-analysis of the clincal and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br. J Surg 2004; 91: 28-37.
- 7) Pouget-Baudry Y, Mucci S, Eyssartier E, et al. The use of the Alvarado score in the management of right lower quadrant abdominal pain in the adult. J Visc Surg 2010; 147: 40-44.
- 8) Lintula H, Pesonen E, Kokki H, Vanamo K, eskelinen M. A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390: 164-70.
- 9) Chong CF, Adi MI, Thien A, et al. Development of the RİPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Singapore Med J 2010; 51: 220-5.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Mine Esmer Gökçe
0000-0002-1354-2453
Türkiye
İlhan Korkmaz
*
0000-0001-5182-3136
Türkiye
Yusuf Tekin
0000-0001-8047-4836
Türkiye
Sefa Yurtbay
0000-0002-7373-1002
Türkiye
Erdal Demirtaş
0000-0003-0853-0623
Türkiye
Orhan Özsoy
0000-0001-7623-504X
Türkiye
Sedat Özbay
0000-0002-7373-1002
Türkiye
Fatma Kukul Güven
0000-0003-3755-6021
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Aralık 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Kasım 2020
Kabul Tarihi
21 Aralık 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2020 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 4