Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bullying in students receiving education at secondary stage primary education public schools in Salihli district of Manisa/Turkey

Yıl 2015, , 102 - 112, 01.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.v37i2.5000119493

Öz

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the levels and determinants of bullying in students receiving education at Secondary Stage Primary Education Schools in Salihli District of Manisa.

Methods: The population of this cross-sectional study consisted of 5., 6., 7., 8. grade secondary school students receiving education in the school year of 2012-2013 in Salihli district of Manisa (n=5671). The sample size was calculated as 720 at a prevalence of 50% and a significance level of 0.05 by taking the pattern effect as 2. Three forms were used in collecting the study data; Sociodemographic questionnaire form, peer victimization identification scale and Rosenberg Self Respect Scale. Chi-square statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis was used of data analysis.

Results: 57.1% of the study group were aged 13 and older. The age distribution was 12.8 ± 1.2 (10-22). 50.6% were girls (n=487). In the study, it was determined that the variables determining victims/persecutors included the gender, social status, life quality perception and self respect. Persecutor/victim behavours were observed at a higher rate in male students compared to female students, students with a lower social status compared to students with a higher social status, those perceiving the life quality as bad compared to those perceiving it as good, and students with a low and moderate self respect compared to students with a high self respect.

Conclusion: Peer victimization is a common public health problem for Manisa/Salihli. In order to struggle with this problem, it is required to develop intervention programs comprising the entire school, family and society in accordance with the Turkish culture.

Keywords: Bullying, persecutor, victim, adolescent

ÖZET

Amaç: Akran zorbalığı, okul ortamında sık görülen ve önlem alınmazsa ciddi fiziksel ve ruhsal travmalara neden olabilen önemli bir halk sağlığı sorunudur. Çalışmanın amacı, Manisa İli Salihli İlçesi Merkezindeki İlköğretim İkinci Kademe öğrencilerinde akran zorbalığı düzeylerinin ve belirleyicilerinin saptanmasıdır.

Yöntem: Kesitsel tipteki bu araştırmanın evrenini Manisa İli Salihli İlçe merkezinde bulunan 2012-2013 yılında eğitim- öğretim gören orta öğretim 5,, 6,, 7,, 8. Sınıf öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır (n=5671). Örnek büyüklüğü desen etkisi 2 alınarak, %50 prevalans ve 0,05 yanılgı düzeyinde 720 olarak hesaplandı. Çalışma verilerinin toplanmasında üç form kullanıldı; Sosyodemografik anket formu, Akran zorbalığı belirleme ölçeği ve Rosenberg Benlik Saygısı Ölçeği. Verilerin analizinde ilk aşamada ki-kare istatistik analizi kullanıldı. Ki-kare analizlerinde fark çıkan değişkenler lojistik regresyon analizi ile değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Araştırma grubunun %57,1’i 13 yaş ve üzerindedir. Yaş dağılımı 12,8 ± 1,2 (10-22). %50,6’sı kızdır (n=487). Çalışmada kurban/zorba olmayı belirleyen değişkenlerin cinsiyet, sosyal statü, yaşam kalitesi algısı ve benlik saygısı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Erkek öğrenciler kız öğrencilere göre, alt sosyal statüdeki öğrenciler üst sosyal statüye göre, yaşam kalitesini kötü olarak algılayanlar iyi olarak algılayanlara göre ve benlik saygıları düşük ve orta olanlar benlik saygıları yüksek olan öğrencilere göre daha fazla zorba/kurban davranışlarında bulunmaktadırlar.

Sonuç: Akran zorbalığı Manisa/Salihli için yaygın bir halk sağlığı problemidir. Bu problem ile mücadelede Türkiye’ye uygun olarak tüm okulu, aileyi ve toplumu içeren müdahale programları geliştirilmelidir.

Kaynakça

  • In another study that was performed by Boulton&Underwood (1992) with second- ary school students, it was observed that there was a decrease in victim rates and an increase in victimization rates in parallel with age, which shows a similarity with
  • Odağ C, Tamar M. The Stage of adolescence: A critical phase in the formation of the superego. Turkish Journal of Child and Ado- lescent 2002; 9: 190-8.
  • Güney M. Depression in adoles- cent. World of Psychiatry 1998; 2: 41
  • Koç M. Terms of developmental psychology of adolescence and general properties. Journal of the institute of social sciences 2004; 2: 231
  • Altıparmak S, Taner Ş, Türk SM, Eser E. The quality of life in ado- lescent in secondary public schools in Bornova/İzmir. Anatolian Jour- nal of Psychiatry 2012; 13: 167
  • Steinberg LS. Ergenlik. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları 2007.
  • Koç Z. School bullying: Defini- tion, measures. Teachers 2006; 1: 7-12. preventing of Journal World
  • Olweus D. A useful evaluation de- sign and effects of the Olweus Bullying Psychology, Crime & Law 2005; 11: 389-402. Program.
  • Due P, Holstein BE, Lynch J. Bul- lying school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 128-32. among
  • Alikaşifoglu M. Erginöz E, Ercan O. Violent behaviour among Turk- ish high school students and corre- lates of physical fighting. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14: 173-7.
  • Dake JA, Price JH, Telljohann SK. The nature and extent of bullying at school. J Sch Health 2003; 73: 173
  • Health behaviour in school-aged children international report from the2005/2006Survey.http://www.e uro.who.int/Document/E91416.pdf Access: 20.06.2015.
  • Manisa Demographic Health Sur- vey Manual. Celal Bayar Universi- ty School of Medicine. Depart- ment of Public Health. Manisa 200 Pişkin M, Ayas T. Peer bullying scale child form. Akademik Bakış Dergisi 2001; 23: 1-12.
  • Rosenberg M. Society and the Ad- olescent Self-Image. New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1965.
  • Dereboy İF, Dereboy Ç, Coşkun A, Coşkun B. Self-concept, self- esteem and sense of identify. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi 1994; 1: 3-12.
  • Özcebe H, Ulukol B, Mol- lahaliloğlu S, Yardım N, Karaman F. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hhizmetlerinde kitabı. Ankara: Yücel Ofset Mat- baacılık 2008. Sağlığı
  • Baldry AC, Farrington DP. Types of bullying among Italian school children. Journal of Adolescence 1999; 22: 423-6. Ivarsson T, Broberg AG,
  • Arvidsson T, Gillberg C. Bullying in adolescence: psychiatric prob- lems in victims and bullies as measured by the Youth Self Re- port (YSR) and the Depression Self-Rating Scale (DSRS). Nord J Psychiatry 2005; 59: 365-73.
  • Kim YS, KohYJ, Leventhal BL. Prevalence of school bullying in Korean middle school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158: 737-41.
  • Alikaşifoglu M, Erginöz E, Ercan O. Bullying behaviours and psy- chosocial health: results from a cross-sectional survey among high school students in Istanbul, Tur- key. Eur J Pediatr 2007; 166: 1253
  • Kepenekci YK, Cinkir S. Bullying among Turkish high school stu- dents. Child Abuse Negl 2006; 30: 193-20
  • Pişkin M. Common problem in our schools: School bullying. VII. Na- tional Counseling and Guidance Congress(Congress Book).Malatya 2003; 9-11: 125.
  • Dussich JPJ, Maekoya C. Physical child harm and bullying-related behaviors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Compara- tive Criminology 2007; 51: 495- 50
  • Nansel T, Craig W, Overpeck MD, Saluja G, Ruan WJ. Cross-national Consistency in the Relationship Between Bullying Behaviors and Psychosocial Adjustment, Arch Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 2004; 158: 730-36.
  • Olweus D. Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and intervention. Current Directions in Psychologi- cal Science 1995; 4: 196-200.
  • Pişkin M. School bullying: Defini- tion, types, related factors, and strategies to prevent bullying prob- lems, Educational Sciences. Theo- ry & Practice 2002; 2: 531-62. Craig WM. The among bullying, victimization, de- pression, anxiety and aggression in elementary school children. Per- sonality and individual differences 1998; 24: 123-30. relationship
  • Konishi C, Hymel S. Bullying and Stress in Early Adolescence. Jour- nal of Early Adolescence 2009; 29: 333-56.
  • Mok MMC, Flynn M. Does school size affect quality of school life? Issues Educ Res 1997; 7: 69-86.
  • Mok MMC. Flynn. Students’ per- ceptions of social studies: A study of middle school and high school students in Jordan. International Journal of Scholarly Academic In- tel- lectual Diversity 2004; 8: 3-13.

Manisa ili, Salihli ilçesinde ilköğretim 6. ve 7. sınıf öğrencilerinde akran zorbalığı, etkileyen ve eşlik eden faktörler

Yıl 2015, , 102 - 112, 01.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.v37i2.5000119493

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, Manisa İli Salihli İlçesi Merkezindeki İlköğretim İkinci Kademe öğrencilerinde akran zorbalığı düzeylerinin ve belirleyicilerinin saptanmasıdır. Yöntem: Kesitsel tipteki bu araştırmanın evrenini Manisa İli Salihli İlçe merkezinde bulunan 2012-2013 yılında eğitim- öğretim gören orta öğretim 5,, 6,, 7,, 8. Sınıf öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır (n=5671). Örnek büyüklüğü desen etkisi 2 alınarak, %50 prevalans ve 0,05 yanılgı düzeyinde 720 olarak hesaplandı. Çalışma verilerinin toplanmasında üç form kullanıldı; Sosyodemografik anket formu, Akran zorbalığı belirleme ölçeği ve Rosenberg Benlik Saygısı Ölçeği. Verilerin analizinde ilk aşamada ki-kare istatistik analizi kullanıldı. Ki-kare analizlerinde fark çıkan değişkenler lojistik regresyon analizi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Araştırma grubunun %57,1’i 13 yaş ve üzerindedir. Yaş dağılımı 10-22 yaşları arasında değişmekteydi.. %50,6’sı kızdır (n=487). Çalışmada kurban/zorba olmayı belirleyen değişkenlerin cinsiyet, sosyal statü, yaşam kalitesi algısı ve benlik saygısı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Erkek öğrenciler kız öğrencilere göre, alt sosyal statüdeki öğrenciler üst sosyal statüye göre, yaşam kalitesini kötü olarak algılayanlar iyi olarak algılayanlara göre ve benlik saygıları düşük ve orta olanlar benlik saygıları yüksek olan öğrencilere göre daha fazla zorba/kurban davranışlarında bulunmaktadırlar. Sonuç: Akran zorbalığı Manisa/Salihli için yaygın bir halk sağlığı problemidir. Bu problem ile mücadelede Türkiye’ye uygun olarak tüm okulu, aileyi ve toplumu içeren müdahale programları geliştirilmelidir

Kaynakça

  • In another study that was performed by Boulton&Underwood (1992) with second- ary school students, it was observed that there was a decrease in victim rates and an increase in victimization rates in parallel with age, which shows a similarity with
  • Odağ C, Tamar M. The Stage of adolescence: A critical phase in the formation of the superego. Turkish Journal of Child and Ado- lescent 2002; 9: 190-8.
  • Güney M. Depression in adoles- cent. World of Psychiatry 1998; 2: 41
  • Koç M. Terms of developmental psychology of adolescence and general properties. Journal of the institute of social sciences 2004; 2: 231
  • Altıparmak S, Taner Ş, Türk SM, Eser E. The quality of life in ado- lescent in secondary public schools in Bornova/İzmir. Anatolian Jour- nal of Psychiatry 2012; 13: 167
  • Steinberg LS. Ergenlik. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları 2007.
  • Koç Z. School bullying: Defini- tion, measures. Teachers 2006; 1: 7-12. preventing of Journal World
  • Olweus D. A useful evaluation de- sign and effects of the Olweus Bullying Psychology, Crime & Law 2005; 11: 389-402. Program.
  • Due P, Holstein BE, Lynch J. Bul- lying school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 128-32. among
  • Alikaşifoglu M. Erginöz E, Ercan O. Violent behaviour among Turk- ish high school students and corre- lates of physical fighting. Eur J Public Health 2004; 14: 173-7.
  • Dake JA, Price JH, Telljohann SK. The nature and extent of bullying at school. J Sch Health 2003; 73: 173
  • Health behaviour in school-aged children international report from the2005/2006Survey.http://www.e uro.who.int/Document/E91416.pdf Access: 20.06.2015.
  • Manisa Demographic Health Sur- vey Manual. Celal Bayar Universi- ty School of Medicine. Depart- ment of Public Health. Manisa 200 Pişkin M, Ayas T. Peer bullying scale child form. Akademik Bakış Dergisi 2001; 23: 1-12.
  • Rosenberg M. Society and the Ad- olescent Self-Image. New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1965.
  • Dereboy İF, Dereboy Ç, Coşkun A, Coşkun B. Self-concept, self- esteem and sense of identify. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi 1994; 1: 3-12.
  • Özcebe H, Ulukol B, Mol- lahaliloğlu S, Yardım N, Karaman F. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hhizmetlerinde kitabı. Ankara: Yücel Ofset Mat- baacılık 2008. Sağlığı
  • Baldry AC, Farrington DP. Types of bullying among Italian school children. Journal of Adolescence 1999; 22: 423-6. Ivarsson T, Broberg AG,
  • Arvidsson T, Gillberg C. Bullying in adolescence: psychiatric prob- lems in victims and bullies as measured by the Youth Self Re- port (YSR) and the Depression Self-Rating Scale (DSRS). Nord J Psychiatry 2005; 59: 365-73.
  • Kim YS, KohYJ, Leventhal BL. Prevalence of school bullying in Korean middle school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158: 737-41.
  • Alikaşifoglu M, Erginöz E, Ercan O. Bullying behaviours and psy- chosocial health: results from a cross-sectional survey among high school students in Istanbul, Tur- key. Eur J Pediatr 2007; 166: 1253
  • Kepenekci YK, Cinkir S. Bullying among Turkish high school stu- dents. Child Abuse Negl 2006; 30: 193-20
  • Pişkin M. Common problem in our schools: School bullying. VII. Na- tional Counseling and Guidance Congress(Congress Book).Malatya 2003; 9-11: 125.
  • Dussich JPJ, Maekoya C. Physical child harm and bullying-related behaviors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Compara- tive Criminology 2007; 51: 495- 50
  • Nansel T, Craig W, Overpeck MD, Saluja G, Ruan WJ. Cross-national Consistency in the Relationship Between Bullying Behaviors and Psychosocial Adjustment, Arch Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 2004; 158: 730-36.
  • Olweus D. Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and intervention. Current Directions in Psychologi- cal Science 1995; 4: 196-200.
  • Pişkin M. School bullying: Defini- tion, types, related factors, and strategies to prevent bullying prob- lems, Educational Sciences. Theo- ry & Practice 2002; 2: 531-62. Craig WM. The among bullying, victimization, de- pression, anxiety and aggression in elementary school children. Per- sonality and individual differences 1998; 24: 123-30. relationship
  • Konishi C, Hymel S. Bullying and Stress in Early Adolescence. Jour- nal of Early Adolescence 2009; 29: 333-56.
  • Mok MMC, Flynn M. Does school size affect quality of school life? Issues Educ Res 1997; 7: 69-86.
  • Mok MMC. Flynn. Students’ per- ceptions of social studies: A study of middle school and high school students in Jordan. International Journal of Scholarly Academic In- tel- lectual Diversity 2004; 8: 3-13.
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Temel Tıp Bilimleri Araştırma Yazıları
Yazarlar

Cengiz Erdik

Saliha Özpınar

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Temmuz 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015

Kaynak Göster

AMA Erdik C, Özpınar S. Bullying in students receiving education at secondary stage primary education public schools in Salihli district of Manisa/Turkey. CMJ. Temmuz 2015;37(2):102-112. doi:10.7197/cmj.v37i2.5000119493