Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2019,
, 658 - 665, 30.09.2019
Öz
Kaynakça
- References
- 1. Karaahmet E. Patents, Trademarks and the Turkish Patent Institute as an information source. [Text in Turkish] Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi 1995;9:386-97.
- 2. N. A. O. Boztosun, “Exploring the utility of utility models for fostering innovation”. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 15, p. 434 (2010) [http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/10685].
- 3. Jabur WP, Santos MJP. Propriedade intelectual: criações industriais, segredos de negócio e concorrência desleal. Sao Paulo: Saraiva; 2007.
- 4. Ortan AN. The European Patent System: Vol. 1. European Patent Convention (The Munich Convention). [Text in Turkish] Ankara: Institute of Research on Bank and Trade Law, 1991.
- 5. Jabur WP, Santos MJP. Propriedade intelectual: criações industriais, segredos de negócio e concorrência desleal. Sao Paulo: Saraiva; 2007.
- 6. The Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology. A Guide to Patent/Utility Model Applications. [Text in Turkish] Ankara: The Turkish Patent and Trademark Office, 2014.
- 7. Smith SW, Sfekas A. How much do physician entrepreneurs contribute to new medical devices? Med Care. 2013;51:461-7.
- 8. Ferreira FK, Song EH, Garcia EB, Ferreira LM. New mindset in scientific method in the health field: design thinking. Clinics. 2015;70:770-2.
- 9. Elisiane Kiel Lee, Lydia Masako Ferreira, Elaine Kawano HoribeI. Patents on hospital medical and dental equipment (EMHO). Question and answer tool. Acta Cir Bras. 2019;34(1).
- 10. F. Narin and E. Noma, Is Technology &coming Science?. Scientometrics (1985) 369-381.
- 11. Martin Meyer. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literatüre. Research Policy 29 2000 409–434.
- 12. Pavitt, K. Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? SPRU Electronic Working Papers series. Paper No 6. Science Policy Research Unit, Brighton, also published in Research Evaluation.1998. 23, 105–111.
- 13. Ganguli, P, Blackman.Patent documents: a multiŽ. edge tool. World Patent Information.1995. 17 4 , 245–256.
- 14. Joaquín M. Azagra-CaroNicolas, CarayolPatrick Lıerena. Patent Production at a European Research University: Exploratory Evidence at the Laboratory Level. The Journal of Technology Transfer March 2006, (31); 2;257–268.
- 15. Keith Pavitt. Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 1998 ;(2) :105–111.
- 16. Petersmann EU. Human rights and the law of the World Trade Organization. JWT 2003;37:241-81.
- 17. Langinier C, Moschini GC. The Economics of Patents: An Overview. Working Paper 02-WP 293. Ames, Iowa: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, 2002.
- 18. Scherer FM. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 1980.
- 19. Yalçıner UG. The Turkish Patent System and Its Management Today and Tomorrow. Paper presented at: International Symposium on Patent Systems and Patent Office Organizations. 1992 Oct 12-13; Ankara, Turkey.
- 20. Sectoral Classification of the Companies Applied to the Turkish Patent Institute for Trademark, Industrial Design and Patent [Internet]. [Website in Turkish]. Ankara: The Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. 2008 - [cited 2017 Dec 01]. Available from: http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/TURKPATENT/statistics/
- 21. Annual report 2011 - Statistics and trends [Internet]. Munich: European Patent Office. 2011 - [cited 2017 Dec 01]. Available from: https://www.epo.org/about-us/annual-reports-statistics/annual-report/2011/statistics-trends/key-trends.html#fields. 22. H. Kronz and H. Grevink, Patent statistics as indicators of technological and commercial trends in the member states of the European Communities (EEC). World Patent Informarion 1980.
An evaluation of national patents and utility models during the last decade in the field of orthopedics and traumatology in Turkey
Öz
Objective: The aim of this study was
to evaluate the number and status of national patents and utility models, which
had been applied for, registered or has become invalid in the field of
orthopedics and traumatology in Turkey between 2007 and 2017. In addition, we
aimed to categorize these patents and identify the areas with the most
inventions.
Method: A61B17, A61F2, and A61F5 patent categories, which
were relevant to orthopedics and traumatology and were applied for between 2007
and 2017 were investigated. In total, 341 patents and utility models which had
a registration number, were pending for approval and those who lost validity were
included in the study and categorized according to their subjects.
Results: Of the 341 patents and utility
models, 172 were registered and valid, 73 were pending for
approval, and 96 were
invalid due to unpaid fees. The leading fields in categorical classification
were spinal surgery with 121 patents and trauma surgery with 102 patents.
According to subcategorical classification, implants led the group with 207
patents, followed by auxiliary tools with 62 patents. About 1/3 of the
registered patents had lost validity.
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that investigates the
status of the patents in the field of orthopedic and traumatology in Turkey.
Spinal and trauma-related patents were
the leading categories. One-third of the patent applications were invalid
due to unpaid fees. Our study can be used as a reference in future studies
investigating the patents and utility models.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- References
- 1. Karaahmet E. Patents, Trademarks and the Turkish Patent Institute as an information source. [Text in Turkish] Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi 1995;9:386-97.
- 2. N. A. O. Boztosun, “Exploring the utility of utility models for fostering innovation”. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 15, p. 434 (2010) [http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/10685].
- 3. Jabur WP, Santos MJP. Propriedade intelectual: criações industriais, segredos de negócio e concorrência desleal. Sao Paulo: Saraiva; 2007.
- 4. Ortan AN. The European Patent System: Vol. 1. European Patent Convention (The Munich Convention). [Text in Turkish] Ankara: Institute of Research on Bank and Trade Law, 1991.
- 5. Jabur WP, Santos MJP. Propriedade intelectual: criações industriais, segredos de negócio e concorrência desleal. Sao Paulo: Saraiva; 2007.
- 6. The Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology. A Guide to Patent/Utility Model Applications. [Text in Turkish] Ankara: The Turkish Patent and Trademark Office, 2014.
- 7. Smith SW, Sfekas A. How much do physician entrepreneurs contribute to new medical devices? Med Care. 2013;51:461-7.
- 8. Ferreira FK, Song EH, Garcia EB, Ferreira LM. New mindset in scientific method in the health field: design thinking. Clinics. 2015;70:770-2.
- 9. Elisiane Kiel Lee, Lydia Masako Ferreira, Elaine Kawano HoribeI. Patents on hospital medical and dental equipment (EMHO). Question and answer tool. Acta Cir Bras. 2019;34(1).
- 10. F. Narin and E. Noma, Is Technology &coming Science?. Scientometrics (1985) 369-381.
- 11. Martin Meyer. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literatüre. Research Policy 29 2000 409–434.
- 12. Pavitt, K. Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? SPRU Electronic Working Papers series. Paper No 6. Science Policy Research Unit, Brighton, also published in Research Evaluation.1998. 23, 105–111.
- 13. Ganguli, P, Blackman.Patent documents: a multiŽ. edge tool. World Patent Information.1995. 17 4 , 245–256.
- 14. Joaquín M. Azagra-CaroNicolas, CarayolPatrick Lıerena. Patent Production at a European Research University: Exploratory Evidence at the Laboratory Level. The Journal of Technology Transfer March 2006, (31); 2;257–268.
- 15. Keith Pavitt. Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 1998 ;(2) :105–111.
- 16. Petersmann EU. Human rights and the law of the World Trade Organization. JWT 2003;37:241-81.
- 17. Langinier C, Moschini GC. The Economics of Patents: An Overview. Working Paper 02-WP 293. Ames, Iowa: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, 2002.
- 18. Scherer FM. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 1980.
- 19. Yalçıner UG. The Turkish Patent System and Its Management Today and Tomorrow. Paper presented at: International Symposium on Patent Systems and Patent Office Organizations. 1992 Oct 12-13; Ankara, Turkey.
- 20. Sectoral Classification of the Companies Applied to the Turkish Patent Institute for Trademark, Industrial Design and Patent [Internet]. [Website in Turkish]. Ankara: The Turkish Patent and Trademark Office. 2008 - [cited 2017 Dec 01]. Available from: http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/TURKPATENT/statistics/
- 21. Annual report 2011 - Statistics and trends [Internet]. Munich: European Patent Office. 2011 - [cited 2017 Dec 01]. Available from: https://www.epo.org/about-us/annual-reports-statistics/annual-report/2011/statistics-trends/key-trends.html#fields. 22. H. Kronz and H. Grevink, Patent statistics as indicators of technological and commercial trends in the member states of the European Communities (EEC). World Patent Informarion 1980.
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Surgical Science Research Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Eylül 2019 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 28 Eylül 2019 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 |