Öz
Introduction and Aim: Along with technological innovations in the world, the health industry has also developed and entered the digital transformation process. This study was designed as a descriptive study aiming to determine the awareness of midwifery students on Industry 4.0.
Materials and Methods: The population of the study consisted of students of the midwifery department of a university. The minimum sample size was calculated in G*power 3.1.9 program. Accordingly, the number of samples to be included in the study for 95% statistical power 0.05 margin of error was determined as 210. The study was completed with 257 midwifery students, taking possible losses into account. Personal information form and Industry 4.0 Conceptual Awareness Scale were used as data collection tools.
Findings: The average age of the students in the study was 21.22 ± 1.84 years, 31.9% of the students were 2nd-year students in the Department of Midwifery, 52.9% of the students had their own computers, 100% of them used smartphones, and 60.7% used computers. The average score of the students on the scale was 89.98 ± 30.5, and it was determined that the students' Industry 4.0 conceptual awareness was at a medium level according to the score obtained from the scale. When the relationship between the place where the students stayed and the scores obtained from the scale was examined, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the scores obtained from the scale of the students staying in the state dormitory and the students staying in the private dormitory (p < 0.05).
Conclusion and Recommendations: In the study, it was determined that the midwifery department students' Industry 4.0 Conceptual Awareness levels were at a moderate level, and the place of residence positively affected the level of awareness of this concept. It is recommended to conduct more research on the subject.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Karadayi Usta S. Industry 4.0 researches conducted in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Operations Management. 2021;5(2):839-61.
- 2. Ozsoylu AF. Industry 4.0. Journal of Cukurova University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2017;21(1):41-64.
- 3. Yelkikalan N, Ozcan S, Temel K. Determination of the industrial awareness: The case of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development. 2019;14(1):31-44.
- 4. Akgul H, Ayer Z. Change and transformation in occupations in Industry 4.0 process. Journal of History School (JOHS). 2020;45:1326-44.
- 5. Akalin B, Veranyurt U. Health 4.0 and artificial intelligence. Journal of Health Professionals Research. 2022;4(1):57-64.
- 6. Aslan S, Güzel S. Industry 4.0 development process and digital transformation in health. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences. 2019:650-9.
- 7. Sood SK, Rawat KS, Kumar D. A Visual review of artificial intelligence and industry 4.0 in healthcare. Computers and Electrical Engineering. 2022;101:107948.
- 8. Ahmad M, Sadiq S, Alluhaidan AS, Umer M, Ullah S, Nappi M. Industry 4.0 technologies and their applications in fighting covıd-19 pandemic using deep learning techniques. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2022;145:105418.
- 9. Nollo G, Pilati F, Tronconi R, Rigoni M. Industry 4.0 at the service of public health against the covid-19 pandemic. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2022;16(5):1735-6. 10. Roy S, Meena T, Lim S-J. Demystifying supervised learning in healthcare 4.0: A new reality of transforming diagnostic medicine. Diagnostics. 2022;12(10):2549.
- 11. Koşti G, Burmaoglu S, Kidak LB. Health 4.0: Projections of forecasted development in the industry on the health sector. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration . 2021;24(3):483-506.
- 12. Sezer K, Gedik O. Moderating role of demographic properties on industry 4.0’s effect on healthcare sector: An application using the technology acceptance model. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2020;38(4):743-76.
- 13. Alam SS, Masukujjaman M, Ahmad M, Jaffor R. Acceptance of online distance learning (ODL) among students: Mediating role of utilitarian and hedonic value. Education and Information Technologies. 2022:1-34.
- 14. Torun NK, Cengiz E. The perspective of university students' through the technology acceptance model (TAM) to industry 4.0. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies. 2019;(22):235-50.
- 15. Öner S. The development and evaluation of a virtual reality simulation to teach the first care of a newborn doctoral thesis. Izmir: Ege University; 2020.
- 16. Ozkoçak Tuna F, Divlek N, Karahan N, Kiziltepe K, Engin Üstün Y. Evaluation of the virtual field experience training program accompanied with simulation for students who cannot complete clinical practice training during the pandemic process: A retrospective review (Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Gynecology Training and Research Hospital Online Education Model Example). Turkish Journal of Women’s Health and Neonatology. 2023;5(1):6-13.
- 17. Maylawati DSa, Ramdhani MA, Zulfikar WB, Taufik I, Darmalaksana W, editors. Expert system for predicting the early pregnancy with disorders using artificial neural network. 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM); 2017: IEEE.
- 18. Dogan O, Baloglu N. Industrial 4.0 Conceptual Awareness Scale. Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research. 2020;22(38):58-81.
- 19. Doğan O, Baloglu N. Industrıal 4.0 conceptual awareness levels of university students. TUBAV Journal of Science. 2020;13(1):126-42.
- 20. Kaygisiz EG, Sipahi H. The investigation of the relationship between individual innovation and industry 4.0 knowledge levels of Y generation university students. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences. 2019;18(2):922-36.
- 21. Isa K, Rosni N, Palpanadan ST. Malaysian University students’perceptions and knowledge level of industrial revolution 4.0. Academy of Education Journal. 2021;12(2):169-78.
- 22. Tinmaz H, Hwa Lee J. A Preliminary Analysis on Korean University students’ readiness level for Industry 4.0 revolution. Participatory Educational Research. 2019;6(1):70-83.
- 23. Motyl B, Baronio G, Uberti S, Speranza D, Filippi S. How will change the future engineers’ skills in the Industry 4.0 framework? A questionnaire survey. Procedia manufacturing. 2017;11:1501-9.
- 24. Yarim MA, Celik S. Teacher’s role and the necessity from the perspectives of the students in Industrial 4.0 age. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 2020;(31):76-92.
- 25. Isik I. Determining the awareness of university students for the industrial 4.0 approach: Example of Aydin master's thesis. Aydin: Aydin Adnan Menderes University; 2022.
- 26. Yildiz SC, Firat SU. Investıgatıon of Industry 4.0 knowledge level of university students in Turkey. Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2020;31:1-16.
Öz
Giriş ve Amaç: Dünyada teknolojik yeniliklerle birlikte sağlık endüstrisi de gelişim göstermiş ve dijital dönüşüm sürecine girilmiştir. Bu araştırma ebelik bölümü öğrencilerinin endüstri 4.0 farkındalıklarını belirlemeyi amaçlayan tanımlayıcı nitelikte tasarlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmanın evrenini bir üniversitenin ebelik bölümü öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Minimum örneklem sayısı G*power 3.1.9 programında hesaplanmıştır. Buna göre %95 istatistiksel güç 0.05 hata payı için araştırmaya dahil edilmesi gereken örneklem sayısı 210 olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada olası kayıplarda göz önünde bulundurularak 257 ebelik öğrencisi ile tamamlanmıştır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak kişisel bilgi formu ve Endüstri 4.0 Kavramsal Farkındalık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Araştırmada öğrencilerin yaş ortalaması 21.22±1.84 yıl olup, öğrencilerin %31.9’u Ebelik bölümü 2.sınıf öğrencisidir.%52.9’unun kendine ait bilgisayarı olup, %100’ü akıllı telefon, %60.7’si bilgisayar kullanmaktadır. Öğrencilerin ölçekten aldığı puan ortalaması 89.98 ± 30.5 olup, Ölçekten alınan puana göre öğrencilerin Endüstri 4.0 kavramsal farkındalıklarının orta düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin kaldığı yer ve ölçekten alınan puanlar arasındaki ilişki incelendiğinde devlet yurdunda kalan öğrenciler ile özel yurtta kalan öğrencilerin ölçekten alınan puanlar arasında anlamlı fark olduğu belirlenmiştir (p< 0.05).
Sonuç ve Öneriler: Araştırmada ebelik bölümü öğrencilerin Endüstri 4.0 Kavramsal Farkındalık düzeylerinin orta derecede olduğu ve yaşanılan yerin bu kavrama ilişkin farkındalık düzeyini olumlu yönde etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Konu ile ilgili daha fazla araştırma yapılması önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Karadayi Usta S. Industry 4.0 researches conducted in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Operations Management. 2021;5(2):839-61.
- 2. Ozsoylu AF. Industry 4.0. Journal of Cukurova University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2017;21(1):41-64.
- 3. Yelkikalan N, Ozcan S, Temel K. Determination of the industrial awareness: The case of Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development. 2019;14(1):31-44.
- 4. Akgul H, Ayer Z. Change and transformation in occupations in Industry 4.0 process. Journal of History School (JOHS). 2020;45:1326-44.
- 5. Akalin B, Veranyurt U. Health 4.0 and artificial intelligence. Journal of Health Professionals Research. 2022;4(1):57-64.
- 6. Aslan S, Güzel S. Industry 4.0 development process and digital transformation in health. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences. 2019:650-9.
- 7. Sood SK, Rawat KS, Kumar D. A Visual review of artificial intelligence and industry 4.0 in healthcare. Computers and Electrical Engineering. 2022;101:107948.
- 8. Ahmad M, Sadiq S, Alluhaidan AS, Umer M, Ullah S, Nappi M. Industry 4.0 technologies and their applications in fighting covıd-19 pandemic using deep learning techniques. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2022;145:105418.
- 9. Nollo G, Pilati F, Tronconi R, Rigoni M. Industry 4.0 at the service of public health against the covid-19 pandemic. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 2022;16(5):1735-6. 10. Roy S, Meena T, Lim S-J. Demystifying supervised learning in healthcare 4.0: A new reality of transforming diagnostic medicine. Diagnostics. 2022;12(10):2549.
- 11. Koşti G, Burmaoglu S, Kidak LB. Health 4.0: Projections of forecasted development in the industry on the health sector. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration . 2021;24(3):483-506.
- 12. Sezer K, Gedik O. Moderating role of demographic properties on industry 4.0’s effect on healthcare sector: An application using the technology acceptance model. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 2020;38(4):743-76.
- 13. Alam SS, Masukujjaman M, Ahmad M, Jaffor R. Acceptance of online distance learning (ODL) among students: Mediating role of utilitarian and hedonic value. Education and Information Technologies. 2022:1-34.
- 14. Torun NK, Cengiz E. The perspective of university students' through the technology acceptance model (TAM) to industry 4.0. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies. 2019;(22):235-50.
- 15. Öner S. The development and evaluation of a virtual reality simulation to teach the first care of a newborn doctoral thesis. Izmir: Ege University; 2020.
- 16. Ozkoçak Tuna F, Divlek N, Karahan N, Kiziltepe K, Engin Üstün Y. Evaluation of the virtual field experience training program accompanied with simulation for students who cannot complete clinical practice training during the pandemic process: A retrospective review (Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Gynecology Training and Research Hospital Online Education Model Example). Turkish Journal of Women’s Health and Neonatology. 2023;5(1):6-13.
- 17. Maylawati DSa, Ramdhani MA, Zulfikar WB, Taufik I, Darmalaksana W, editors. Expert system for predicting the early pregnancy with disorders using artificial neural network. 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM); 2017: IEEE.
- 18. Dogan O, Baloglu N. Industrial 4.0 Conceptual Awareness Scale. Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research. 2020;22(38):58-81.
- 19. Doğan O, Baloglu N. Industrıal 4.0 conceptual awareness levels of university students. TUBAV Journal of Science. 2020;13(1):126-42.
- 20. Kaygisiz EG, Sipahi H. The investigation of the relationship between individual innovation and industry 4.0 knowledge levels of Y generation university students. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences. 2019;18(2):922-36.
- 21. Isa K, Rosni N, Palpanadan ST. Malaysian University students’perceptions and knowledge level of industrial revolution 4.0. Academy of Education Journal. 2021;12(2):169-78.
- 22. Tinmaz H, Hwa Lee J. A Preliminary Analysis on Korean University students’ readiness level for Industry 4.0 revolution. Participatory Educational Research. 2019;6(1):70-83.
- 23. Motyl B, Baronio G, Uberti S, Speranza D, Filippi S. How will change the future engineers’ skills in the Industry 4.0 framework? A questionnaire survey. Procedia manufacturing. 2017;11:1501-9.
- 24. Yarim MA, Celik S. Teacher’s role and the necessity from the perspectives of the students in Industrial 4.0 age. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. 2020;(31):76-92.
- 25. Isik I. Determining the awareness of university students for the industrial 4.0 approach: Example of Aydin master's thesis. Aydin: Aydin Adnan Menderes University; 2022.
- 26. Yildiz SC, Firat SU. Investıgatıon of Industry 4.0 knowledge level of university students in Turkey. Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2020;31:1-16.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Temel Tıp Bilimleri Araştırma Yazıları |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Eylül 2023 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 26 Eylül 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3 |
