Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3, 125 - 134, 30.09.2023

Mustafa Hakan Acer , Hilal Özbek , Demet Çakır

https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1345351

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Doepke M, Sorrenti G, Zilibotti F. The economics of parenting. Annual Review of Economics 2019; 11(1): 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030156
  • 2. Vignoli D, Bazzani G, Guetto R, Minello A, Pirani E. Uncertainty and narratives of the future: a theoretical framework for contemporary fertility. In Schoen R (Ed.), Analyzing Contemporary Fertility. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis 2021; 51: 25–47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48519-1_3
  • 3. Sakman E. Gönüllü çocuksuzluk: Çocuk sahibi olmama kararının altında yatan faktörler ve karşılaşılan tepkiler hakkında bir derleme. Psikoloji Çalışmaları 2021; 41(1); 83–109. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0105
  • 4. Mynarska M, Brzozowska Z. Things to gain, things to lose: perceived costs and benefits of children and ıntention to remain childless in Poland. Social Inclusion 2022; 10(3): 160–171. https://doi.org/10.17645/SI.V10I3.5377
  • 5. Gezer Tuğrul Y. Toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında kadınların annelik deneyimleri üzerine bir saha çalışması. Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi 2019; 3: 71–90.
  • 6. Arslan S, Okcu G, Margirit Coşkun A, Temiz F. Kadınların gebeliği algılama durumu ve bunu etkileyen faktörler. HSP 2019; 6(1): 179–192. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.432333
  • 7. Zeybekoğlu Akbaş Ö, Dursun C. Toplumsal değişme sürecinde annelik serüveni: genç annelikten geç anneliğe geçiş. Akademik Hassasiyetler 2022; 9(20): 107–128. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-5774.
  • 8. Alçin Şahintürk D, Çelebi AK. Doğurganlık hızını arttırmaya yönelik kamu mali teşvikleri: Avustralya, Japonya, Danimarka, Fransa, Kanada ve Rusya analizi. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 2021; 49: 69–47. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.870493
  • 9. TÜİK-Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. TÜİK Haber Bülteni. In Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni 2022 https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Dunya-Nufus-Gunu-2022-45552
  • 10. Lappegård T, Kristensen AP, Dommermuth L, Minello A, Vignoli D. The impact of narratives of the future on fertility intentions in Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family 2022; 84(2): 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMF.12822
  • 11. Comolli CL, Vignoli D. Spreading uncertainty, shrinking birth rates: A natural experiment for Italy. European Sociological Review 2021; 37(4): 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcab001
  • 12. Matysiak A, Sobotka T, Vignoli D. The great recession and fertility in Europe: A sub-national analysis. European Journal of Population 2021; 37(1): 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10680-020-09556-Y/FIGURES/6
  • 13. Vignoli D, Minello A, Bazzani G, Matera C, Rapallini C. Narratives of the future affect fertility: evidence from a laboratory experiment. European Journal of Population 2022; 38(1): 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10680-021-09602-3/TABLES/4
  • 14. Aşcı Ö, Gökdemir F. Doğurganlığa ve çocuk sahibi olmaya yönelik tutum ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması adaptation of attitudes toward fertility and childbearing scale to Turkish. Kocaeli Med J 2021; 10(1): 194–205.
  • 15. Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • 16. Söderberg M, Christensson K, Lundgren I, Hildingsson I. Women’s attitudes towards fertility and childbearing – A study based on a national sample of Swedish women validating the Attitudes to Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS). Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2015; 6(2); 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SRHC.2015.01.002
  • 17. Ali M, Alauddin S, Farida Khatun M, Maniruzzaman M, Mohammed Shariful Islam S. Determinants of early age of mother at first birth in Bangladesh: a statistical analysis using a two-level multiple logistic regression model. Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice 2021; 29: 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01228-9/Published
  • 18. Damar E, Bolsoy N. Doğurganlık ve çocuk doğurmaya yönelik tutum ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences 2021; 7(3): 1–34.
  • 19. Kossakowska, K., & Söderberg, M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the attitudes to fertility and childbearing scale (AFCS) in a sample of polish women. Current Psychology 2021; 40(7): 3125–3135. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-020-01004-8/TABLES/4
  • 20. Bahtiyar-Saygan B, Sakallı-Uğurlu N. Development of attitudes toward voluntary childlessness scale and ıts associations with ambivalent sexism in Turkey. 2019; 40(17): 2499–2527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19860168
  • 21. Eroğlu K, Koruk F, Koruk İ, Çelik K, Güner P, Kiliçli A. Women’s reproductive behaviour and perspectives on fertility, and their modifying factors, in a Turkish province with a high fertility rate. The European Journal of Contraception & ReproductiveHealth Care 2021; 26(2): 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2020.1857355
  • 22. Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlstrom P-O, Tyden T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics, Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 558-564. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei367
  • 23. Tough S, Tofflemire K, Benzies K, Fraser-Lee N, Newburn-Cook C. Factors influencing childbearing decisions and knowledge of perinatal risks among Canadian men and women, Mat Child Health 2007; 11: 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0156-1
  • 24. Aly R, Aly M. The situation of egyptian women in childbearing and family planning and some related factors: A perspective of correspondence analysis. Universal Journal of Public Health 2023; 11(1): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujph.2023.110103
  • 25. Coutinho RZ, Golgher AB. Modelling the proximate determinants of fertility for Brazil: the advent of competing preferences. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População 2018; 35(1): e0041. https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098A0041
  • 26. Lane SD, Burns RD, Fu Y, Golub R, Ivkov-Dzigurski A, Simeunovi´c VS. Determinants of fertility ıntentions of the women in Bosnia and Herzegovina—An example from the Semberija Region. Behavioral Sciences 2023; 13(5): 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/BS13050417

INVESTIGATION OF NULLIPAROUS WOMEN'S ATTITUDES TOWARD FERTILITY AND CHILDBEARING

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3, 125 - 134, 30.09.2023

Mustafa Hakan Acer , Hilal Özbek , Demet Çakır

https://doi.org/10.7197/cmj.1345351

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine the attitudes of nulliparous women toward fertility and childbirth.
Material and Method: The research was carried out as a cross-sectional descriptive method with improbable sampling technique. Recruitment for participation in the study took place with power analysis and consisted of 213 nulliparous women who had never been pregnant before. Data were collected with the Personal Information Form and the Attitudes Toward Fertility and Childbearing Scale.
Findings: 54% of the women are between the ages of 19-26 and the mean age is 26.51±5.19. It was determined that 76.5% of the women were married for 1-3 years and 65.7% of them used contraception. The total score of the Attitudes Towards Fertility and Childbearing Scale is 69.54±8.28, and the mean subscale score current obstacle 21.57±7.08; importance in the future 28.42±4.63; female identity is 19.55±3.82. It has been determined that women have a positive attitude to fertility and childbearing. In comparison with the total score of the scale and the variables, it was determined that there was a significant difference between variables of age, occupation status, spouse's age, spouse's occupation status, spouse's smoking status, consanguineous marriage, family type, financial status, spouse's age at marriage and mean value of total scale score.
Result: The fact that nulliparous women's attitudes to fertility and childbearing are affected by many factors such as age, occupation status, spouse's age shows that there are many variables that should be considered during the evaluation of nulliparous women by midwives. It is very important for pregnancy planning that women in the preconceptional period have positive attitudes to fertility and childbearing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nullipara Fertility Childbirth Attitude

Kaynakça

  • 1. Doepke M, Sorrenti G, Zilibotti F. The economics of parenting. Annual Review of Economics 2019; 11(1): 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030156
  • 2. Vignoli D, Bazzani G, Guetto R, Minello A, Pirani E. Uncertainty and narratives of the future: a theoretical framework for contemporary fertility. In Schoen R (Ed.), Analyzing Contemporary Fertility. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis 2021; 51: 25–47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48519-1_3
  • 3. Sakman E. Gönüllü çocuksuzluk: Çocuk sahibi olmama kararının altında yatan faktörler ve karşılaşılan tepkiler hakkında bir derleme. Psikoloji Çalışmaları 2021; 41(1); 83–109. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-0105
  • 4. Mynarska M, Brzozowska Z. Things to gain, things to lose: perceived costs and benefits of children and ıntention to remain childless in Poland. Social Inclusion 2022; 10(3): 160–171. https://doi.org/10.17645/SI.V10I3.5377
  • 5. Gezer Tuğrul Y. Toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında kadınların annelik deneyimleri üzerine bir saha çalışması. Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi 2019; 3: 71–90.
  • 6. Arslan S, Okcu G, Margirit Coşkun A, Temiz F. Kadınların gebeliği algılama durumu ve bunu etkileyen faktörler. HSP 2019; 6(1): 179–192. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.432333
  • 7. Zeybekoğlu Akbaş Ö, Dursun C. Toplumsal değişme sürecinde annelik serüveni: genç annelikten geç anneliğe geçiş. Akademik Hassasiyetler 2022; 9(20): 107–128. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-5774.
  • 8. Alçin Şahintürk D, Çelebi AK. Doğurganlık hızını arttırmaya yönelik kamu mali teşvikleri: Avustralya, Japonya, Danimarka, Fransa, Kanada ve Rusya analizi. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 2021; 49: 69–47. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.870493
  • 9. TÜİK-Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. TÜİK Haber Bülteni. In Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Haber Bülteni 2022 https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Dunya-Nufus-Gunu-2022-45552
  • 10. Lappegård T, Kristensen AP, Dommermuth L, Minello A, Vignoli D. The impact of narratives of the future on fertility intentions in Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family 2022; 84(2): 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMF.12822
  • 11. Comolli CL, Vignoli D. Spreading uncertainty, shrinking birth rates: A natural experiment for Italy. European Sociological Review 2021; 37(4): 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcab001
  • 12. Matysiak A, Sobotka T, Vignoli D. The great recession and fertility in Europe: A sub-national analysis. European Journal of Population 2021; 37(1): 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10680-020-09556-Y/FIGURES/6
  • 13. Vignoli D, Minello A, Bazzani G, Matera C, Rapallini C. Narratives of the future affect fertility: evidence from a laboratory experiment. European Journal of Population 2022; 38(1): 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10680-021-09602-3/TABLES/4
  • 14. Aşcı Ö, Gökdemir F. Doğurganlığa ve çocuk sahibi olmaya yönelik tutum ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması adaptation of attitudes toward fertility and childbearing scale to Turkish. Kocaeli Med J 2021; 10(1): 194–205.
  • 15. Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • 16. Söderberg M, Christensson K, Lundgren I, Hildingsson I. Women’s attitudes towards fertility and childbearing – A study based on a national sample of Swedish women validating the Attitudes to Fertility and Childbearing Scale (AFCS). Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 2015; 6(2); 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SRHC.2015.01.002
  • 17. Ali M, Alauddin S, Farida Khatun M, Maniruzzaman M, Mohammed Shariful Islam S. Determinants of early age of mother at first birth in Bangladesh: a statistical analysis using a two-level multiple logistic regression model. Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice 2021; 29: 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01228-9/Published
  • 18. Damar E, Bolsoy N. Doğurganlık ve çocuk doğurmaya yönelik tutum ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences 2021; 7(3): 1–34.
  • 19. Kossakowska, K., & Söderberg, M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the attitudes to fertility and childbearing scale (AFCS) in a sample of polish women. Current Psychology 2021; 40(7): 3125–3135. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-020-01004-8/TABLES/4
  • 20. Bahtiyar-Saygan B, Sakallı-Uğurlu N. Development of attitudes toward voluntary childlessness scale and ıts associations with ambivalent sexism in Turkey. 2019; 40(17): 2499–2527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19860168
  • 21. Eroğlu K, Koruk F, Koruk İ, Çelik K, Güner P, Kiliçli A. Women’s reproductive behaviour and perspectives on fertility, and their modifying factors, in a Turkish province with a high fertility rate. The European Journal of Contraception & ReproductiveHealth Care 2021; 26(2): 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2020.1857355
  • 22. Lampic C, Svanberg AS, Karlstrom P-O, Tyden T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics, Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 558-564. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei367
  • 23. Tough S, Tofflemire K, Benzies K, Fraser-Lee N, Newburn-Cook C. Factors influencing childbearing decisions and knowledge of perinatal risks among Canadian men and women, Mat Child Health 2007; 11: 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0156-1
  • 24. Aly R, Aly M. The situation of egyptian women in childbearing and family planning and some related factors: A perspective of correspondence analysis. Universal Journal of Public Health 2023; 11(1): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujph.2023.110103
  • 25. Coutinho RZ, Golgher AB. Modelling the proximate determinants of fertility for Brazil: the advent of competing preferences. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População 2018; 35(1): e0041. https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098A0041
  • 26. Lane SD, Burns RD, Fu Y, Golub R, Ivkov-Dzigurski A, Simeunovi´c VS. Determinants of fertility ıntentions of the women in Bosnia and Herzegovina—An example from the Semberija Region. Behavioral Sciences 2023; 13(5): 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/BS13050417
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Aile Bakımı
Bölüm Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Araştırma Yazıları
Yazarlar

Mustafa Hakan Acer 0000-0002-7007-545X

Hilal Özbek 0000-0001-6368-2633

Demet Çakır 0000-0003-4794-516X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2023
Kabul Tarihi 27 Eylül 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023Cilt: 45 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA Acer MH, Özbek H, Çakır D. INVESTIGATION OF NULLIPAROUS WOMEN’S ATTITUDES TOWARD FERTILITY AND CHILDBEARING. CMJ. Eylül 2023;45(3):125-134. doi:10.7197/cmj.1345351
 Kapak Resmi İndir