Araştırma Makalesi

Intraoperative Lung Mechanics In Post-Covid Healthy Pregnants Who Required Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cilt: 46 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2024
PDF İndir
EN TR

Intraoperative Lung Mechanics In Post-Covid Healthy Pregnants Who Required Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether lung mechanics were affected in patients recovering from Covid-19 without ARDS who did not undergo lung imaging during the active infection period. Methods: The study included pregnant patients undergoing cesarean section operations. Participants were divided into two groups: those who had recovered from Covid-19 within the past year (group 1, n=50) and those who had never been infected with Covid-19 (group 2, n=50). The study included 100 patients divided into two groups: those who had recovered from Covid-19 within the last year (group 1, n=50) and those who had never experienced Covid-19 infection (group 2, n=50). Peak pressure (Ppeak), plateau pressure (Pplato), dynamic compliance (Cdyn), and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values, measured by the anesthesia machine, were recorded at specified time intervals following intubation. Results: Comparisons of Ppeak, Pplato, ΔP, Cdyn, and R data at specified times (1 min, 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, and 40 min) showed no significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: No significant differences in lung mechanics were found between the Covid-19-recovered patient group and the control group. Differences observed in SpO2, MAP, and Cdyn values in both groups are considered to be expected changes associated with routine procedures of general anesthesia

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Hess DR, Faarc R. Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Respir Care. 2014;59(11):1773-1794. doi:10.4187/RESPCARE.03410
  2. 2. Dikmen Y. Mekanik Ventilasyon-Klinik Uygulama Temelleri. (Dikmen Y, ed.). Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri; 2012.
  3. 3. Robb J. Physiological changes occurring with positive pressure ventilation: part one. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1997;13(5):293-307. doi:10.1016/S0964-3397(97)80493-4
  4. 4. Baldomero AK, Skarda PK, Marini JJ. Driving Pressure: Defining the Range. Respir Care. 2019;64(8):883-889. doi:10.4187/RESPCARE.06599
  5. 5. Bugedo G, Retamal J, Bruhn A. Driving pressure: A marker of severity, a safety limit, or a goal for mechanical ventilation? Crit Care. 2017;21(1):1-7. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1779-x
  6. 6. Morgan G, Mikhail M, Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Morgan&Mikhail Klinik Anesteziyoloji. 5.th. (Cuhruk FH, ed.). McGraw-Hill; 2015.
  7. 7. Yarkın T. Mekanik Ventilasyon Sırasında Solunum Monitörizasyonu. Yoğun Bakım Derg. 2007;7(7):322-327.
  8. 8. Jensen D, Webb KA, Davies GAL, O’donnell DE. Mechanical ventilatory constraints during incremental cycle exercise in human pregnancy: implications for respiratory sensation. J Physiol. 2008;586:4735-4750. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2008. 158154

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık ve Toplum Hizmetleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Eylül 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Temmuz 2024

Kabul Tarihi

6 Ağustos 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Balcı F, İsbir C, Gündoğdu O, vd. Intraoperative Lung Mechanics In Post-Covid Healthy Pregnants Who Required Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial. CMJ. 2024;46(3):164-168. doi:10.7197/cmj.1511986