Objective: Comparison
of conventional microdiscectomy with sequestrectomy in lumbar disc herniation
(LDH) surgery with ligamentum flavum (LF) preservation technique.
Method: Study
design was approved by local ethics committee. We retrospectively reviewed LDH 320
patients operated for disc pathologies in L3 - S1 levels in our clinic between
June 2015 - June 2017. Two groups were formed in the study: sequestrectomy and
conventional microdiscectomy. Demographic, operational and outcome data were
compared between the groups.
Results: Sequestrectomy group included 71 patients and conventional microdiscectomy
group included 60 patients. There was no statistically significant difference
between the groups in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, smoking, body mass
index, disc pathology level, operative complications, amount of bleeding,
length of stay, disc recurrence and low back pain, radicular pain, quality of
life, surgical success and satisfaction results. Satisfactory improvement rates
were found in the conventional discectomy (85%) and sequestrectomy group
(91.5%) in mid-term follow-up. Operation time (mean 61.1 vs 94.6 min), and early postoperative opioid requirement
(14.1% vs 27.1%) were significantly lower in the sequestrectomy group.
Conclusions: In LDH surgery with LF preservative technique, satisfactory results were obtained with both
methods with comparable. Recurrence rates and outcome. However, sequestrectomy is appropriate in cases
without a wide annular defect due to the short operation time, low opioid
requirement.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Surgical Science Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | September 30, 2019 |
Acceptance Date | September 25, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2019 |