Benign ve malign endometriyal patolojilerin klinik ve demografik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1 28 Mart 2014
  • Dinçer Sümer
  • Ayşe Yenicesu
  • Abdullah Boztosun
  • Fırat Çil
  • Yasin Bıyık
  • Ahmet Mutlu
  • Ali Yanık
PDF İndir
EN TR

-

Abstract

Aim. The objective of this study is to compare clinical and demographic data of benign and malign pathologies of endometrium and to describe risc factors for endomatrial carcinoma. Method. Eighty-eight patients which was hysterectomised in our clinic between 2006 and 2010 was included. Twenty eight of these has the diagnosis as ‘proliferative endometrium’, twenty nine as ‘hyperplasia of endometrium’, thirty-one as ‘endometrioid type of endometrial carcinoma’. Data were collected from patient files retrospectively. Results. Pregnancy and parity rate, presence of diabetes mellitus and smoking were not altered for groups. Endometrial thickness and presence of hypertension were significantly higher for carcinoma group. Endometrial carcinoma patients were generally postmenauposal and had younger menarche age. Discussion. Advanced age, early menarche, increased endometrial thickness, hypertension and postmenapouse are risk factors for endometrial carcinoma.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90.
  2. Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Kanser Daire Başkanlığı 20042006 Yılları Türkiye Kanser İnsidansı http://kanser.gov.tr/folders/file/8iL-2006SON.pdf
  3. Kumar V, Abbas A. Robbins and Cotran patologic basis of disease eight edition Philadelphia saunders elsevier 2010; pp: 1005-65.
  4. Xu WH, Xiang YB, Ruan ZX, Zheng W, Cheng JR, Dai Q, Gao YT, Shu XO. Menstrual and reproductive factors and endometrial cancer risk: Results from a population-based case-control study in urban Shanghai. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 613Sorosky JI. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 436-47.
  5. Göksedef BP, Akbayır Ö, Çorbacıoğlu A, Güraslan H, Şencan F, Erol O, Çetin A. Comparison of preoperative endometrial biopsy grade and final pathologic diagnosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2012; 13: 106-10.
  6. Aka N, Civak LÜ, Köse G, Türkay Ü, Karayel S, Aksu Ö. Endometrial Kanser: 58 Olguda Tanı ve Tedavi Deneyimi. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi 2007; 10: 16-22.
  7. Tabor A, Watt HC, Wald NJ. Endometrial thickness as a test for endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 663-70.
  8. Timmermans A, Opmeer BC, Khan KS, Bachmann LM, Epstein E, Clark TJ, Gupta JK, Bakour SH, van den Bosch T, van Doorn HC, Cameron ST, Giusa MG, Dessole S, Dijkhuizen FP, Ter Riet G, Mol BW. Endometrial thickness measurement for detecting endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 160

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Ayşe Yenicesu

Abdullah Boztosun

Fırat Çil

Yasin Bıyık

Ahmet Mutlu

Ali Yanık

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Mart 2014

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Mayıs 2013

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Sümer D, Yenicesu A, Boztosun A, vd. Benign ve malign endometriyal patolojilerin klinik ve demografik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. CMJ. 2014;36(1):51-56. doi:10.7197/cmj.v36i1.1008002146

Cited By